508 



JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY 



[Vol. 4 



TABLE OF HOSTS AND PARASITES OF BRUCEIDM-Cmduded 



1 Hunter No. 1455 mentioned in the description of this species refers to B. com- 

 pressicornis and B. bisignatus; but as bisignatus was not reared from the locaUty 

 mentioned, the specimens of H. prosopidis were parasitic on B. compressicornis. 



2 Hunter No. 1454 mentioned in the description refers to B. ochraceus. 



3 In his redescription of this species Crawford gives the following: "Type speci- 

 mens bred from Prosopis juliflora, where it was probably parasitic on Bruchus 

 prosopis." 



* Hunter No. 1700 mentioned in the description of this species refers to B. quadri- 

 dentaius. 



6 Although the type specimens of this species are labelled "Parasite of Bruchus 

 prosopis" as indicated in the description, the other labels on the pins show that they 

 were bred from B. sallcei. The discrepancy is due to an erroneous determination 

 of the host. 



6 The paratj-pes recorded in the description as bred from Bruchus prosopis were 

 so labelled through a mistaken determination of the host. 



' The type specimens of this species are labelled as indicated in the description 

 as parasitic on Laria (Bruchus) prosopis. This was, however, an erroneous deter- 

 mination of the host. The other labels on the pins show the host to have been B. 

 sallcei. 



a The description of this species records the types as having been "bred from 

 Bruchus sp. on Vachellia. The Bruchus sp. ia B. sallcei. 



