414 Forestry Quarterly. 



Progress records. 



How does the output compare in quality and quantity with what sliould 

 be done ? 



Are the exceptionally good and bad performances clearly shown up? 

 Maintaining efficiency. 



Is there adequate instruction in new methods? 



Is there esprit de corps? 



Is there professional pride? 



Is there suitable reward for efficiency? 



Analysis of Conference. 



Sequence of time activities. 



Duration of task. 



Proper sequence of parts. 



Suitable finishing off. 



Best time of day for performance of task. 

 Equipment. 



Light. 



Ventilation. 

 • Chairs. 



Reference data. 



Refreshments — cigars, etc. 

 Straight line methods. 



Concentration on main issue. 



EHmination of side issues. 



Frankness. 



Polite but effective termination of interview. 

 Progress records. 



Comparison of output with quantity and quality standards. 



Showing up of exceptionally good or bad performances. 

 Maintaining efficiency. 



Adequate instruction. 



Promotion of esprit de corps. 



Promotion of professional pride. 



Adequate rewards. 



Analysis of Dictation. 

 Sequence of time activities. 



Duration of task. 



Proper sequence of parts. 



Suitable finishing off. 



Best time of day for performance of task. 

 Equipment. 



Li^t. 



Ventilation. 



Chairs. 



Desk. 



Writing materials. 

 Straight line methods. 



Concentration. 



Elimination of side issues and distractions. 



Clear enunciation. 



Arrangement of papers. 

 Progress records. 



Comparison of output with quality and quantity standards. 



Showing up of exceptionally bad or good performances. 

 Maintaining efficiency. 



Adequate instruction. 



Promotion of esprit de corps. 



Promotion of professional pride. 



Adequate rewards. 



