94 IOWA STUDIES IN NATURAL HISTORY 



3. ATRYTONOPSIS LUNUS 



Pamphila lunus Edwards, Papilio IV, 56, 1884, 



Arizona, June to August. 



Similar to deva but larger and darker, and with the white areas not so 

 pure as in deva. 



4. ATRYTONOPSIS DEVA 



Hesperia deva Edw., Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. v, 292, 1876. 

 Biol. Cent.-Am., Rhop. n, 498, pi. 95, ff. 6-10, 1900. 



Arizona and Utah. Skinner lists southern Colorado (Cat. p. 87). 



5. ATRYTONOPSIS VIERECKI 



Pamphila vierecki Skinner, Ent. News xin, 213, 1902. 



Ft. Wingate, New Mexico, June ; two males, one compared with the 

 type, in the Barnes collection are all that I have seen. 



Vierecki is similar to deva but smaller, paler and more grayish, with 

 two spots in the end of the cell of the primaries, sometimes connected, and 

 a well marked stigma in the male. 



6. ATRYTONOPSIS PITTACUS 



Pamphila pittacus Edw., Papilio II, 138, 1882. 



Biol. Cent.-Am., Rhop. n, 498, pi. 95, ff. 11-13, and 14, 15 (not python 



Edw.), 1900. 

 Skinner, Ent. News xi, pi. n, ff. 17, 18, 1900. 

 Kellogg, Am. Ins. pi. ix, ff. 17, 18, 1904. 



Arizona, July. 



The straight row of hyaline spots on the secondaries characterizes pitta- 

 cus among our species. 



7. ATRYTONOPSIS PYTHON (Plate I, Fig. 1) 

 Pamphila python Edw., Papilio II, 139, 1882. 

 Arizona, May and June. 



Python is the only one of our species in which the spots are distinctly 

 yellowish. 



7a. race MARGARITA 

 Pamphila margarita Skinner, Can. Ent. xlv, 426, 1913. 

 Described from Jemez Springs, New Mexico. 

 I am not familiar with this form. 



8. ATRYTONOPSIS CESTUS 



Pamphila cestus Edw., Papilio iv, 57, 1884. 



Southern Arizona. I am not familiar with this species. 



9. ATRYTONOPSIS EDWARD SI 



Atrytonopsis edwardsi B. & McD., Contributions in, (2), 135, pi. vm, ff. 

 9, 10, 1916. 



