EEEATA AND ADDENDA. 
Page 2, No. 15. The specific name of Leptosia Lathyri was first proposed by Hubner in 
Lis Verzeichniss for the misnamed Papilio Sinapis, Linn. The insect called by 
the former name by modern French -writers, is a distinct species. 
„ 11, Nos. 2, .3, and 4, accordinj? to a note received from Mr. Henry Doubleday, belong- to 
Anthrocera Trifolii. The true A. Lonicerse, disting-iiished by its long-, slender 
antennae, and very narrow border to the posterior -wings, is not figured. In this 
species tlae spots are seklom, if ever, confluent ; -whereas, in A. Trifolii, the g-reat 
majority of the specimens have them so, more or less. 
Whilst this Edition has been going: through the press, a very distinct species, 
A. Minos, has been taken'plentifulJy in Galway. 
„ 12. Reverse the numbers of Smerinthus Populi, (which should be fig. 9); and Tilias, 
which should be fig. 8. 
„ 22, No. 49, after Castrensis, add M. & F. 
„ 27, No. 81. Mr. Henry Doubleday informs me this is Psyche intermediella of Bruand. 
Nos. 82, 83, 84, and 85. According to the same g-entleman, these figures appear to be 
one species, Ps. pulla, of Esper, P. pullella, of Bruand's Monograph. The female of 
this species is vei-miform, and widely diflfers from the same sex of intermediella, 
which has perfect legs and antennae. The small size and indistinct characters of 
these four figures render their specific determination impossible. 
„ 31, No. 111. This figure represents a variety of Triphaena orbona. No. 110. The true sub- 
sequa, which is found in the New Forest, is very distinct, and has never been 
figured in this country. 
,, 32, No. 119. This represents the type of Lytsea agathina, and fig. 1C61, (PI. 52), a 
variety of it. 
„ 34, No. 134. This is the female of Agrotis puta. 
„ 36, No. 149. Agrotis subgothica, according to Mr. Henry Doubleday, is an American 
species. 
„ 37, No. 155. This is a variety of sp. 156, according to Mr. H. Doubleday. 
„ 42, No. 189. This is the male of Myth, lythargyria, and fig. 190, the female. 
No. 192, J'o7' quereus, 7-ead quercus. 
„ 43, No. 193. Mr. H, Doubleday considers this as a variety of the preceding, Meristis 
quercus. 
,, 44, No. 204. Mr. H. Doubleday considers this to be a variety of Caradr. cubicularis, 
No. 203. 
„ 45, No. 211. This, according to Mr. H. Doubleday, is the Orrh. spadicea, W. V.,Hb., &c. 
(not our No. 210.) 
„ 48, No. 229. This figure represents the type of Xylophasia rurea, of which a variety is 
gi ven in fig. 230. Mr. H. Doubleday has reared both varieties from the same broods 
of larvse. 
No. 231, after Hepatica, dele the v. 
„ 61, No. 321. This figure, according to Mr. H. Doubleday, represents Acr. Rumicis, of 
which another figure is given in fig. 319. 
„ 66, No. 356, 357, 358. Mr. H. Doubleday considers these three figures as representing only 
one species, Non. lutosa, of Hiibner, of which a specimen from Mr. Curtis' cabinet is 
represented in fig. J 668, (pi. 52.) 
The true N. cannae is represented in oar Supplemental fig. 1712. 
„ 68, No. 373, for Gemini punctata, read Gemini puncta. 
„ 68, No. 375, is given under the name of Calamia Phragmitidis, bv Mr. Stephens, in Cat. 
Lep. Br. Mus. f. 138. 
,, 70, No. 389. This is the type and not a variety of Cucullia Gnaphalii, and add as a 
synonym, Cucullia Solidaginis, Stepb. Trans. Ent. Soc. ii. pi. 3,f. 7. 
