1022 PEQCEEDIXGS OF THE THIRD ENTOMOLOGICAL MEETING 



Exflanations of the Plates illustrating Captain Froilano de Mell's pwper- 

 on the Trichonymphid parasites of some Indian Termites — contd. 



39 — 40. Leidyri campanula. 



41 Enchelyspheroides trichoiiympfianim. 



42. Butantidium lennilh, n. sp. 



43. Pijrmnympha grassii, n. sp. 



44. Pyrsonympha flngellala (after Grassi). 

 45 — 47. Opalina termitis, n. sp. 



48 — 49. Nyctotherus fietcheri, n. sp. 



50. Nycfotlieriis termitis (after Dobell). 

 5j — 5(3. Fraiiciella termitis. n. g., n. sp. 



PLATE 170. 



57 — 00. Trichouymphids from posterior intestine of Coptotermcs (after Bugnion, iletn. 



Soc. Zonl. France 1910, p. 114, fig. 1). 

 01 — 08. Trichonymphids from ArrIiinoterm.es ilavus (after Bugnion, Mem. Soc. Zool- 



f™ncel911, t. 3.ff. 6— 13). 



69 74. Triclionymplia-agilis from Hodotermes viarum. 



75 — 78. Holomastigoles elongatum (after Grassi and Sandias, I.e., t. 5, ff. 21 — 24). 



79. Pyrsonympha vertens (after Ray Lankester). 

 80 — 87. Trichonymphids from Calotermes greeni (after Bugnion and Popoif, J/em. Soc. 



Zool.' France 1910, t. 5). 



88. Jani'i annectens (after Grassi and Sandias, t. 5, f. 0). 



89. Microjccriia hexamitoides (after Grassi and Sandias, t. 5, f. 10). 



90. Gymnonympha zeylanica (after Dobell, Spolia Zeylan, VII, t. 2, f. 1). 



91. Lophomonas blattarum (after Minchin, Inlrod. Study Protozoa fig. 45a). 



92. L. Idattarum, dividing stage (after Minchin, I.e., fig. iSc). 



93. Steplianonympha (after Franca, Soc. Port. Sci. Nat. VIII, p. 8, fig. Dl). 



94. Caduceia tlieobronue (after Franca, I.e., t. 2, f. 1). 



79.— GENITALIA OF SOME CEYLONESE HESPEEIADiE.- 

 Btj W. Ormiston, F.E.S. 

 (Plates 171—172.) 



The leading work on this Family is still " A revision of the Oriental 

 Hesperiidaj " by Messrs. Elwes and Edwards. Unfortunately the authors 

 had apparently few Ceylon specimens to examine and so I fear that 

 several of our species will require renaming. 



Their work mainly decides questions of specific identity by an 

 examination of the preheftsores of the males, and the authors point out 

 '■ that a very considerable practice in making this examination and 

 great experience in estimating the value of the characters observed, 

 are necessary to form an opinion on the subject.'' I confess that I have 



