p. 59) and through the kindness of Mr. S. Henshaw we are able to 

 give a figure of this type on PI. VI, Fig. 14; the S specimen from 

 Monterey Co. ex Coll. Grossbeck, mentioned in the original descrip- 

 tion is in the American Museum and Mr. F. Watson the Curator has 

 sent us a sketch of the Uncus which corresponds with that figured by us 

 on PI. X, Fig. 1. As may be seen by a reference to this figure it is 

 very different from that of the preceding species, the neck being 

 rather long and narrow, the forks narrow, compressed laterally at 

 apex and bent downward with a small terminal hook which is quite 

 characteristic; the depth of the bifurcation varies somewhat but it is 

 usually about equal to the length of the neck. 



If this S is conspecific with the 9 type, which it is impossible 

 for us to determine at the present moment, our identification may be 

 regarded as fairly safe ; the species appears to be rather wide-spread 

 in apparently two generations along the whole Pacific Coast from 

 San Diego to \'ancouver Is., B. C. The typical form is without green 

 shades, the antemedian area being shaded with warm brown ; it occurs 

 ostensibly in June and our figure (PI. III. Fig. 8) of a S from 

 Monterey Co. we regard as fairly typical ; we have other specimens, 

 rather deeper in shade, taken in June in San Diego Co. Wright has 

 recently applied to two forms of this species from San Diego (Ent. 

 News, XXVII, p. 460) the names olivata and pallidata; we are able 

 through the kindess of Mr. Swett to figure Co-types of these forms (PI. 

 VI, Figs. 5, 7) which appear, according to the shape of the Uncus, to 

 be correctly associated with cdenata; these Co-types before us were 

 captured in February and March which would point to an early spring 

 generation ; this is corroberated by a series from Sonoma Co. in our 

 collection, captured also in February, three specimens of which we 

 figure on PI. Ill, Figs. 5-7; as already stated we were inclined to 

 consider these as referable to glaucata but if our present conception 

 of glaucata prove to be correct they will probably represent a good race 

 of edenata agreeing as they do in the structure of the Uncus. 



Mr. Swett mentions (C. Ent. 47, p. 60) a large Vancouver Is. 

 form as belonging to cdenata; we have before us 1 5,3 9 of this 

 form, captured in March and April, 1 9 , which we figure, showing 

 considerable green tinges, the other three specimens being largely brown 

 with pale basal and median areas. There is nothing in the structure 

 of the Uncus to separate these B. C. specimens from those of Sonoma, 



