MiNxns OF Court of Yohogavlj^ Cocx-n-- 263 



.75) Hall V Wells Contd. 



Grayham v Logan Contd. 

 Beeler v Walker Contd. 

 Woods V McKee Contd. 

 Morrison v Surgest Contd. 

 Froman v Boyce Contd. 



Common Orders. 



Lindsay -^ ^ -A. 



Spivy V 1 . Wt. Enqy. 



Nelson V Shilling Judgmt. Wt. Ezzy. 

 Shilling V Nelson. Jugt. Wt. Eaqy. 

 Lawrence v Rogers. Jadgt. Wt. Enqj. 



Appearances. 



Colwell V Wray. A C 



Mattocks V Brown. A C 



Williams v Garby Agreed. 



Deal V Hays Contd. 



Crooks V Hogland Contd. 



Patterson v McComish Contd. 



V Emberson Agreed. 



McKav V Davidson "i ^ . 

 - - Contd- 



V the same } 



Brown V Manocks A C 



Morrison v Vannatree Contd. 



Bouseman v McGoldrick Contd. 



Myers v Hooper Dismised P R. 



Willson V Richards Contd. 



Ralston v Lowry Contd. 



Pearce v E\-ins. Contd. 



Commingo v Boggs .A. C. 



Kinkaid v He: 



vHer.. 



Martin v Shillings Discont. 



McDonald v Slover -\. C. 



Hogland v McNew .\lia. 



( 76) Springer vs. Listenet Ac irs. Agd. 



Same vs. Same .\sd. 



