180 Annals of the Carnegie Museum. 



5. BucHNER, Otto. Ueber individuelle Formverschiedenheiten bei Anodonten. 



Jahreshefte des Vereins Vdlerlandischer Nalurkiinde in Wiirtemberg. Fiinfund- 

 sechzigster Jahrgang, p. 50, 19 10. 



6. Clessin, S. Unto hatavus in der Umgebung von Regensburg. Nachrichlsblalt 



d. Deutschen malakozoologischen Gesellschafl, 1910, 1912, p. 120. 



7. CoKER, R. E. Mussel Resources of the Holston and Clinch Rivers in eastern 



Tennessee. Report U. S. Bureau Fisheries for 191 1. 



8. CoKER, R. E. Water Power Development in Relation to Fishes and Mussels 



of the Mississippi. Append. VIII to Report of U. S. Commissioner of Fish- 

 eries for 1 91 3. 



9. CoKER, R. E. AND SOUTHALL, J. B. Musscl Resources in Tributaries of the 



Upper Missouri River. Append. IV to Report of U. S. Commissioner of 

 Fisheries for IQ14. 



10. COMSTOCK, C. B. Report upon the Primary Triangulation of the U. S. Lake 



Survey. Washington, 1882. 



11. Dangl.ade, Ernest. The Mussel Resources of the Illinois River. Bureau 



of Fisheries Doc. 804, p. 9, 40, 41, 43, 44, 1913. 



12. Davenport, C. B. Evolution of Pecten. Proceed. Amer. Acad. Arts &= 



Sciences, Vol. 39, 1904. 



13. Frierson, L. S. Remarks on the Classification of the Unionidae. Nautilus, 



Vol. XXIV, pp. 134, 136, 1914. 



14. Grier, N. M. New Varieties of Naiades from Lake Erie. Nautilus, Vol. 32, 



1918, pp. 9-12. 



15. Haas, F. and Schw.arz, E. Die Unioniden des Gebietes zwischen Mainz 



und deutschen Donau in tiergeographischer Hinsicht. Abhand. d. Konig. 

 Bayer, Akad. d. Wissenschaft., Math. Physikal. Klasse, XXVI, Band VII, 



1913- 



16. Hazy, Julius. Die Mollusken-Fauna von Budapest, III, Biologisch-er Theil, 



Malakazoologischer Blatter, 1881. 



17. Headlee, T. J. andSimonton, J. Ecological Notes on the Mussels of Winona 



Lake. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., pp. 173-179, 1903. 



18. He.\dlee, T. J. Ecological Notes on the Mussels of Winona, Pike, and 



Center Lakes of Kosciusko Co., Ind. Biological Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 6, 

 1906. 



19. Horton, a. H., H.\ll, M. R., Bolster, R. H., Leighton, M. O. Surface 



Water Supply of the LTnited States, 1907-08, Part III, Ohio River Basin, 

 pp. 29, 35, 47. 



20. HuEBER, L. V. Zur Naturgeschichte der Unionen. Jahrb. des nalurhislor- 



ischen Landes-Museum von Kdrnthen, Heft. 10, pp. 150-157, 1870. 



21. ISELY, F. B. Experimental Study Growth and Migration of Fresh Water 



Mussels. Bureau of Fisheries Document 792, 1913. 



22. Israel, W. V. Die Najadeen des Weidagebietes. Beilage zum Nachrichtsblatt 



d. Deutschen Malakozoologischen Gesellschafl, No. 4, 1910, p. 4. 



23. Israel, W. V. Najadologische Miscellen. Nachrichtsblatt d. Deutschen Mala- 



kozoologischen Gesellschaft, No. 4, 19 10, p. 4. 



24. ISR.\EL, W. V. Biologic der Europaischen Siisswasser Muscheln. Thiiringer 



Lehrerverein f. Naturkunde, Stuttgart, 1913. 



