378 



iitdcala dorsoïateralis, sonietimes doublé. 



ut. suprastigmalis. 



'in. subdorsalis^ doublé. 



in. infradigmalis and in. posUtifiinalis. 



two in. hasnU's m onu horizontal line. 



one very tiny, elongated in. pedalk. 



iïere too we find an excellent correspondence between the spots 

 of the pupa and the primary tubercula of the larva, which fact 

 the more deserves our attention, as they had become totally irre- 

 cognisable in the last larval instar. This is of great importance in 

 connection with the conception of the colour pattern of the chrysalis. 



Recapitulation: 



I. The apparently homogeneous setae have been derived froni 

 the primitive pattern, as it occur in instar /. 



II. This pattern almost completely resembles that of F. brasslcae 

 and other caterpillars. (Type I). 



III. In instar III s. dorsoIaferaUs, which at first only occurred 

 on the thoracic segments, appears on the abdominal segments. 



IV. The pattern of the pupa can be traced to that of instar i, 

 not to that of instar F, but there is besides a spot in the position 

 of s. dorsolateralis. 



V. Linea dorsalis and stigmalis are indistinct, only in instar V 

 they are represented by coloured lines and the last line is made 

 up of spots near the stigma. 



Family Riodinidae. As far as I know, no description of the 

 larvae mentions a distinct setal pattern. 



Family Lyhytheidae. According to Edwards, quoted by Fracker, 

 the larvae resemble Pieridae as far as their setae are concerned. 



Family NyinphaUdae. This family is here taken in the sanie 

 wide sense as W. Muller did in 1886. 'ThevGiove t\\Q Lyninadidae^ 

 Itho'iniidae^ Heliconidae, Agapetidae are also included in it, together 

 with the Satyrinae., Danainae and the Nymphalinae s. str. 



Gruber (1884) describes the development of the scoli from the 

 primary setae, W. Muller (1886) contradicts this. He says that 



