28 Pentandria, Pentagynia. | Sedum. 
suppl. p.24, and is unknown to me. 
Pee far it really differs from the following spe- 
cies I confess I have yet to learn. But Willde- 
now, in the place above cited, says—** Similli- 
mum Sedo glauco, sed diversum : foliis minus 
glaucis longioribus, caule diviso, qui in Sedo 
glauco simplex apice cymg trifida instructus, cy- 
mis bipartitis, vel ramis simplicibus indivisis flo- 
ribus obsitis, petalis inedite, quee uninervia in 
illd. 
Sedo glauco." Ji 
glau- — S. (annual glaucous) foliis teretiusculis glaucis, 
cum. cyma trifida, ramis recurvato-patentibus, floribus 
4. . dodecandris hexapetalis, petalis mueronatis uni- 
nervis. JVilld. enum. p. AS6.—IValst. et. Kit. 
hung. 2. p. 198. t. 181. 
Hanrzxr i in —— arenosis Banatüs. H. 
iame must remain with the present 
plant by ipt of priority, the only just right (ab- 
surd names ever excepted) in n such cases: and 
the Sedum glaucum of Curtis, (in his Garden 
and Catalogues), of English Botany, and of 
Syn. pl. succ., must receive another appellation : 
I here propose the na 
albes- — S. (perennial glaucous.) 
cens. un pem Curtis : Hawortli : Smüh. 
5. Oss. "The var. 8 of Syn. succ. 117, is the plant 
T figured i in Engl. bot. 1.2477. 
recurva- S. — (eeurved) foliis tereti-subulatis mucronatis 
tum. ramorum reflexis, flo- 
6. alium acento patentibus, ramis cymae recur- 
i 25. 
'sPlanta parva; v horto. Berolinense, 
A. D. 1820, sub hoc nomine, in horto Chelsci- 
