29" 10' 



e»«oo' — 



2B»50 



28" 40" 



e 



28" 30' 



ZB" 20' 



28* 10' 



2B»00 



-PONCE OE <^y ^ 



■ - - - "■ |J^4& . 



V 



y 



^1% 



• oV:) 



TITUSVILLE 



COCOA 



MELBO 



z 

 o 



2 



o 



^A/\/a/aa//,aa\/,/./, a/.aaA 



BlOOO' B0»50' BO" 40" B0"» 30' BO" 20' 



Longitude W. 



80» 10 



SO* 00' 



Figure 3. — Cape Canaveral Area. Extent of scallop beds shown as area enclosed by hatched lines (area between about 10 



and 40 fathoms). 



GENERAL 



Figure 4 shows, for the 4 years, the total 

 landings and value of the Cape Canaveral Area 

 commercial fisheries and the same informa- 

 tion for the combined landings and values for 

 the eight dominant species. These figures do 

 not show any definite trends, as 1959 and 1962 



are below the 4-year average and 1 960 and 1 961 

 are above it. Although 1962 was not so pro- 

 ductive a year as either 1960 or 1961, it was 

 above 1959--the same general condition pre- 

 vailed with regard to the combined figures for 

 the eight donninant species. 



Considering the landings individually for the 

 eight dominant species (fig. 5 and table 4), we 



17 



