26 Annals or the Carnk(;ik Musfatm. 



Absolam Sparks ver jn'.' Carpenter, A Sum. 



Joseph Wells ver Jn" Carpenter, C. o, in Eject. 



W"" Scott ver William Caldwell, Continued. 



Jn" Tilton v Jn'.' Bodkin, alias 



James M' Mechen v Alexander Douglas ; the Defendt Came 

 in to Coart & acknowledged the debt in the plaintiffs Declara- 

 tion alledg"^. Wherefore, the Court have Consider:! that the 

 s'! douglass pay the sum of Twenty pounds fifteen shillings 

 Pen's money, of equal value to sixteen pounds twelve shillings 

 Virginia money &: Costs 



George Corn ver Jona Simmons, Continued 



Rob't walker v. W'." Hawkins, C o 



V. Jn" Hanly, alias 



David M'Clure v Jeremiah Dunn, Dismiss' d 



James Caldwell v Sam! Mason, Continued, the s'.' Mason 

 entering himself Defendant. 



Orderd that Isaac Tayler be allowd for his service of going 

 express to & Returning from Williamsbourgh, the sum of 

 Twenty five pounds. Likewise 12 shillings he paid upon the 

 Cards Consignd for this County, to be paid by the party that 

 may draw the same agreeable to Certificate. 



Ordered that Soloman Hedges & Jn? Williamson, Gentle- 

 men, distribute the publick cards Consignd to this County 

 upon proper & sufficient Certificates to them produc.d 



( Jrderd that the sheriff Collect a publick Tax of four & 

 Twenty shillings Poll upon all Tithables within this County, 

 & pay the same to the Different orders from this Court, Except- 

 ing the proportion Levy to the treasurer. 



Lsaac Tayler v Nathan Templeton, S. B. 



Andrew Robinson v Conrad Wheat, C o 



James Gillaspy v W'!' Caldwell & Jane, in Slander ; the 

 Defend william failing to appear thoug Solomly Call:* by de- 

 fend, t and on order from this Court, on Motion of the plaintiff, 

 ordered that the same be forthwith try*". Whereupon then 

 Came a Jury as above, & bring a verdict for the plaintiff of 

 three pounds & Costs, & Damage i peney. 

 (21) Sprig V. Jeremia Dunn C. O. against William Hawkins for 



Rescue. 



Dan' Gillaspy v Conrad Wheat, Continued. 



