2000 



■o 

 o 



(O 



E 



3 



1000 



BONNEVILLE DAM 

 1946 



Riv«r Flow 



Water Ttmperoturt 



60" 3 



o 



m 

 a. 

 E 



so° 



600 



500 c 



o 

 w 



3 

 O 



400 t 



300 



200 



100 



C) 



Jun« 



July 



Au^ 



Fig. 6 - Comparison of water ten?)erature, river flow, and daily shad count through 



fishways at Bonneville Dam, 19U6 



