6 SiDEBOTTOM, Foraniiiiifcra from the Island of Delos. 



I am doubtful about the odd specimen Fig. 2, PI. 3, as it 

 bears a certain resemblance to Fornasini's (1900) outline 

 figure on page 396, fig. 45, under the name Pitlvinulina 

 adriatica, of which it might possibly be an immature 

 example. This specimen is much more complanate than 

 the others. 



* Pulvinulina oblonga, Williamson, sp. 



Nautilus auricular, var. j3, Fichtcl and Moll (:03), 

 p. 108, pi. 20, figs, d, e,f. 



Rotalina oblonga, Williamson ('58), p. 51, pi. 4, figs. 

 98-100. 



Ptilvinulina oblonga, (Williamson), Brady ('84), p. 688, 

 pi. 106, fig. 4. 



Only about six of moderate size were found. Some 

 of the Palermo tests are large. Very rare. 



* Pulvinulina oblonga, (Williamson), var. scabra, l^rady ? 

 (PI. 3, Figs. 3, 4). 



Pulvimdi)ia oblonga (Williamson), var. scabra, Brady 

 ('84), p. 689, pi. 106, fig. 8. 



I am a little doubtful as to whether these should be 

 placed under this species, or under P. oblonga. The tests 

 run smaller than the Delos or Palermo examples of P. 

 oblonga, but they can be distinguished by the fact that the 

 surfaces of the earlier chambers on the superior side are 

 concave, or flat, whereas in P. oblonga they arc more or 

 less convex. 



In the Delos and Palermo specimens the rugosity of 

 the superior surface is very seldom present. The final 

 chambers of the tests are not .so much inflated on the 

 superior side, as are the specimens I have from Cebu, and 

 especially those from Bermuda, nor is the amount of 



