MmicJiester Mevwirs, Vol. liii. (1909), No. %\. 17 

 x^PPENDIX. 



*Miliolina ferussacii, d'Orbigny, sp. (I'l. 5, Fig. 7.) 



Qninqiieloculina rodolphhia, d'Orbign)' ('46), p. 299, 

 pi. 20, figs. 7-9. 



Q. Maritc, d'Orbigny ('46), p. 300, pi. 20, figs. 13-15. 

 Miliolhia fentssacii (d'Orb.), Brady ('84), p. 175, pi. 



113, fig- 1;- 



The specimens found are apparently very feeble 

 examples of the elongated variety of M. ferussacii. Those 

 from Palermo are al.so elongated, but better developed, 

 and finer in every way. Rare. 



Miliolina contorta, d'Orbigny, sp. (PI. 5, Fig. 8.) 



Quinqueloculina contorta, d'Orbigny ('46), p. 298, 

 pi. 20, figs. 4-6. 



This appears to be a weak form of this variable 

 foraminifer, in which the chambers have lost most of their 

 angularity. The specimens vary a good deal in this 

 respect, and in the one selected for illustration the 

 angularity is hardly apparent. Frequent. 



Miliolina, sp. (PL 5, Fig. 9.) 



There are four or five of these, of which the one 

 figured is the largest, and has the costae much more 

 developed than the others have. All the tests appear to 

 be distorted, and I feel doubtful under which species they 

 should be placed. The test is very much compressed, 

 and keeled, and the mouth is a narrow slit. Terquem 

 figures specimens from the Pliocene of the Isle of Rhodes 

 ('78), P- 70. pl- 13 (pl- 8), figs. 4, 8, under the name of 

 Quinque/oc?i/irza depressa d'Orhigrty, which, bear a, certain 

 amount of likeness to the Delos forms, especiall)' his 



