208 



BULETINUL SOCIETĂŢII DE ŞTIINŢE 



Projektion der analysierten Gesteine des Coziaziiges (•) und der Vergleichsgesteine (X) 



Fig. 5 



I = No. 4.687. Augengneis s: a^^ c, fg 



II =No. 4.741. Aplit: 



III = No. 4.742. « 



'13 



f. 



^79'20 ' "5»8- 



^9'5 ^2 "^S'S ^73'98' "5'7- 



IV = No. 4.745. Kontaktgranit: a, 63,5 fg,^ 870,70 ; n^gg. 



V = No. 4.722. Biotitschiefer 



x^ a = Granit Typus Syene : 



X b = Granitaplit Typus Orno : 



X c = Granit Typus Umpham : 



X d = Esse.xit Rongstock : 



^5-5 ^^2 'l2'5 %6'20J "S'S 

 3,1(1 Ci Iq SfjiT.ji \ D 



^10 



'i 



*9 

 42'5 <^0»5 ^7 



77'44' "6'6- 

 ^79'U ' "C'9' 



'6'5 





9»5 ^70- 



12'5 *57'17' "7'3 



n- 



