150 
— agree the type of a new genus, and, so far as can 
a “sas male flowers only, clearly referable to 
maly may be explain hin 
iia two of the four eae ws us sally ‘present i in the order, 
abort, and that the remaining two, appens with See 
pr aed sepals of Kayea, have a at 2s zstivation. An- 
circumstance that Pegg me as — is, that ie 
ibe between the sepals is very intimate, as not 
to present any eran of the place es ere eit o-curs— 
hence the coro fore anthesis have the 
ppearance of being inclosed i in a bag, the more so, as 
e 
ened, as pliable as wet bladder. During anthesis, it 
mlits into two equal halves, cee cad tals and nu- 
erous stamens, but in the male flowers, no trace of a 
pistil—the genus may be thus sp haee and defined. 
ee R. W. 
“Flowers unisexual Sepals (2 ?) ecg gid 
united orig closed es in estivation. Petals 4, im 
very numerous, sub-monadel phous at 
the base, Ramkte short, slender: anthers oblong, 2- 
ILLUSTRATIONS OF INDIAN BOTANY. 
psn cells approximated parallel, opening lengthwise, 
a slightly prolonged and t trieated, at the 
stil alto gether wan pc —Fem 
Aen youn ts terete or ole ails 4-sided, 
leaves glabrous, opposite, short peti ioled, tiene lan- 
ceolate e, obtuse, thick, hard and coriaceous, marked 
with a pr enone — but eahout oem et fare rallel 
merous, congested on lateral tuber- 
2 Soin the axils of fallen leaves pees ve 
orming dense lateral capitule, peduncles 
short, l-flow 
C. iaapten: mW. 
Malabar near Bombay. 
Tam a to ot get Esq. of tee for my 
the Cat f this which he thought, might be 
os Caloph len onal of Wallich’s list mentioned 
te non hujus generis.’ As this conjecture 
rite So ieombeths T oi en that A thers name. 
he genus so far as its affinities can be made out from 
the male flower ouly, is most n et allied to ppere but 
being admitted into that 
family, and a“ bear me out in considering it anew and 
distinct genus 
EXPLANATION OF PLATE 44, 
wie Cambogioides, (Graham.) Garcinia 
| page 
A. Floweri branch, female)—-B. The same in 
ce dadarel aioe: : = 
ee — _flower.—2. Stigma removed.—3. Male 
—4. Side view of the same, the petals 
E lophyltum Walkerii, ae natural size.——2, 
: er—natural size.—3. 
: sora piece.—4. An ant 
ee ieee6 A diagram of 
Pans Grains of pol- 
the ‘aeivain Ovary, style, 
A 
same dissected, 
removed to show the staminal colar Back view 
s taken from a flow- 
n ce—all more or 
eSs magnified. — —8-9. Full grown fruit cut transversely 
and vertically —natural Size. 
EXPLANATION OF PLATE 45, 
and stigma, the ne transversely.—8. The . 
cut vertically.—9. A fruit—natural Gee ah with the 
poate deat mentioned, on or less magnified. 
_ os . oo S.—After this wa was completed and the greater part of it printed, I received 
y’s “ Flora Medica” 
ection with medicine. 
burgh’s Xan 
Brown had hsb at Murra 
wo 
Lf aving NO new species 
weight of his ‘authority, to that of those who ad 
X ymus, ni pst 
eka w work just issued from the press, and like all works 
. of the —— aathor ening a most valuable pints batins to ee 
on this. In this work I find Dr. Lindley has added _the 
opt Murray’s aie acta in preference to Rox- 
: asons wee ; 
specimen and ascertained that it pions of two pl bab 
ere, ne see which, lee; isa Xanthochymus, the other, not in oo. ieee at to be 
’s Hebi iron, Waving aac my belief that Xanthochymus does not belong te 
raham, namely, that Mr. 
o add, nor other information to communicate res- 
end to have noticed at genus in this e. But as I have said above 
a agmitis ought to be suppressed and Xicleohawe: established in its room, 
tostate oe my reasons for thinking so—I shall commence by extract- 
al Magazine Companion” the passage of Mr. Brown’s letter, quoted by Dr. 
ty, for saving. tha the generic name Xanthoc ochymus must be drop- 
tis. The t sent pasted by mane to Sir Joseph Banks, as one ~ 
ed ic be made up of two Bagge oe vod probably of two genera. 
sealing wax. The on ine flower, an which agrees in structure 
ee ‘nO doubt, the a mus ovalifolius of Roxburgh. 
o 
