152 



carycsfoliella, Clem.-Chb. 4 Ky. 

 castanecsella, Chb. i Ky. (new to me.) 

 celtisella, Chb. 15 Ky. (new to me.) 

 Cincinnatella, Chb. 14 Ky (new to me.) 

 Ckmensiella, Chb. 9 Ky. (unfit for determination.) 



conglomerate/la, Zell. 4 Te.xas. (not Chambers ; wanting among his spec. 

 co7isimiIella, Frey. r Cambridge, (not Chambers.) 



■ cory/iella, Chb. i Ky. (unfit for determination.) var. ostrycFella, Chb. 

 corylisella, Chb. i Ky. (unfit for determination.) from the hazel, Chb. 

 craUvgeUa, Clem.-Chb. 7 Ky. from quince and wild cherry (new to me.) 

 deceptisella, Chb. i Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 Fitchella, Clem.-Chb. 2 Ky. Zell. 2 Te.xas (is quercetoriim, Frey; 



Clemens' name to be retained.) 

 fuscocostella, Chb. 3 Ky . (new to me. ) 

 gemmea, Frey. 2 Cambridge, (not Chambers ; the specimens are of very 



light color. ) 

 guttifinitclla, Chb. 8 Ky. (new to me.) 

 Hagenii, Frey. 4 Cambridge, (is jiecophmsella, Chambers.) 

 hamadryadella, Clem.-Chb. 6 Ky. (a good spec, new to me.) 

 helianthivorella, Chb. i Ky. (unfit for determination.) 

 intermedia, Frey. 4 Cambridge, (not Chambers.) 

 longestriata, Frey i Cambridge, (not Chambers.) 

 lucetiella, Clem.-Chb. 2 Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 lucidicostella, Clem.-Chb. 5 Ky. (a good spec new to me.) 

 necopinuseUa, Chb. i Ky. (is Hagenii, Frey.) 

 obsciiricostella, Clem.-Chb. i Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 obsoletella, Frey. 3 Cambridge, (not Chambers.) 

 or?iatella, Chb. 6 Ky.; 5 Cambridge. (Frey's spec, is the same, as far as 



Chambers' specimens allow to judge.) 

 osbycefoliella, Clem.-Chb. 2 Ky. (npt recognizable.) 

 popidieUa, Chb. i Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 quercella, Chb. i Col. (new to me.) 

 [quercetorum, Chb. i Mo. is Fitchella, Clem.) 

 quercivorella, Chb. i Ky. 

 quinquetiotella, Chb. 2 Texas, (new to me.) 

 Rilevella, Chb. i Mo. (a good specimen ; new to me.) 

 RobimeUa,(Z\&m..-Oi\h. 3 Ky.; Frey. 9 Cambridge, (right.) 

 salicifoliella, Clem.-Chb. 7 Ky. (Chambers' species is new to me, and there- 

 fore has not been described by me; it is very different from Sciidderella, 

 tnough I had agreed formerly with Chambers about the identity, as I see 

 now erroneously; salicifoliella, is a most beautiful species; the American 

 fauna is apparently very rich for Lithocolletis.) 

 Sciidderella, Frey. 6 Cambridge, (not Chambers.) 

 Solidaginisella, Chb. i Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 Tiliceella, Chb. 4 Ky. (a good spec, new to me.) 

 Texanella, Zell. 2 Texas. 

 Tritceniaella, Chb. 4 Ky. (not recognizable.) 

 Tubiferella, Chb. 2 Ky. (a good specimen.) 



Ulmella, Chb. 12 Ky. (a good spec, very nearly related to intermedia, Frey.) 

 tinifasciella, Chb. i Ky. (new to me.) 



Of the Lithocolletidcz recorded in Chambers' Index, 58 are in the col- 

 lection; there are wanting 10 types of Chambers' species, 5 of Frey's 



