OF ARTS AND SCIENCES. Ill 



70. Anadedis. 

 1867. But!., Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. [3] xix. 50 : Himachala. Sole 

 species, and therefore type, as subsequently indicated by 

 the same writer. See also Theope. 



71. AnvEa. 

 1816. IlUbn., Verz. 48: Tro^lodyta (Troglodita), Morvus (Laertias, 

 Acidalia),Leonida, llhipheus (lliphea). The last is not a 

 butterfly. 

 TrogloJyta may be taken as tlie type. 



72. AxAPii^is. 

 1816. Iliibn., Verz. 93 : Creona, Chloris, Java (Coronea). 

 Creona may be taken as the type. 



73. AXARTIA. 



1816. Iliibn., Verz. 33 : Arsinoe, Jatroplise, Amalthea (Amathea). 

 1849. Doubl., Gen. Diuru. Lep. 214 : divides the group into two 

 sections, in the first of which he places Jatrophce and in 

 the second Lytrea (Lytrssa), and others, including Amal- 

 thea (Amathea) ; the group is equivalent, he says, to 

 Boisduval's MS. genus Cela^na (see Celoena). 

 Felder adopts the same division, and we may therefore restrict the 

 group to the first division, and consider Jatroplia3 as the type. 



74. Anastrus. 



1822-26. riUbn., P^x. Schm. ii. : Corbulo (obscurus). Sole species, 

 and therefore type. 

 Tliis may stand, though it is worth stating that Ilubner had pre- 

 viously (Verz. 181(i) placed this species in two other and different 

 genera. See Cela;norrhinus and Talides. 



75. Anatole. 



1816. IIubn.,Verz. 24: Zygia, Penthea. 



These two species not being congeneric, and this generic term liav- 

 ing been retained by ditTerent authors, such as Doubleday, Westwood, 

 Bates, Kirby, for the first species, it may be considered as the type. 



76. Anchtphlebia.* 

 1868. Butl., Ent. Monthl. Mag. iv. 195 : Arclicea. Sole species, 

 and specified type. 

 Tails before Anlirrhea (qv.); Butler's objection to Antirrhca, that 

 it was not characterized by its author, may lie urged just as strongly 

 against many of Boisduval's genera, accepted by him. 



