104 ^ PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY 



27. ^Erodes. 

 1820. Dalm. in BDlb., Enum. Ins. 79 : Idomeneus. Sole species, 

 and therefore type. 

 If, liowever, this species is strictly congeneric with Eurylochus, the 

 genus will tail before the earlier Caligo (q. v.). 



28. -^iIropetes.* 

 1820. Billb., Enum. Ins. 79 : Licus (Licas), Tulbaghia. 



There is a Castnian with the name of the first species, and it is prob- 

 ably tlie insect meant hy Billberg, although the species is Drury's, and 

 not Fabriciiis's, as stated by the writer. The group as tiius constituted 

 consists of wholly incongruous material, and may be discarded. See 

 Meneris. 



29. -3Etheius. 



1816. HUbn., Verz. 109 : Pretus, Archytas, Meris. 



Archytas may be selected as type, although belonging to a different 

 family from the other two; for it alone belongs to the group in which 

 Hiibner placed this genus. 



30. JEthilla. 



1868. Hewits., Hesp. 55 : Eleusinia. Sole species, and therefore 



type. 

 1870. Bull., Eut. Monthl. Mag. vii. 57 : designates Eleusinia as 

 type. 



31. Aganisthos.* 

 1836. Boisd., Spec, gen., pi. 4 B. : Odius (Orion). Sole species, and 

 therefore type. 

 Used in same sense by subsequent authors. Probably, however, it 

 must fall before Historis (q. v.) 



32. Agapetes. 

 1820. Billb., Enum. Ins. 78 : Galathea, Lachesis. 



Galathea may be taken as type. See Mclanargia, Satyrus, and Arge. 



33. AGATinNA.* 



1843. "White, Zool. i. 28 : 3Iargaretta. Sole species, and therefore 

 type. 

 The name is, however, preoccupied in mollusks (Raf. 1881). 



34. Ageronia. 

 1816. Iliibn., Yerz. 42: Ami^hinome, Arethusa (Laodamia), Feronia, 

 Chloe. 



Subsequent usage has been in accordance with thia. 



