OF ARTS AND SCIENCES. 159 



£55. DOXOCOPA. 

 1816. IlLibn.. Vcrz. 49: Erminea, Iris, Ilia (Ilia, Astasia), Agathina, 



Polysena (Epilais). 

 18G5. Ilerr.-Schaeff., Pro;lr. i. 80 : uses it for I<lyia, Celtis, Argus, 



none of them Ilubiier's species, although congeneric with 



Agathiua. 

 1872. Scudd., Syst. Rev. 9 : in accordance with Ilerrich-Schaeffer's 



use of the name, specifies Agathina as type. 



But it cannot so be considered, since Agathina must be referred to 

 Clilorippe (q. v ). Erminea has been taken as the type of Apaturina, 

 Iris and Ilia belong to Potamis, and hence tliis group must be restricted 

 to Polyxena and its allies. 



35G. DuuciNA. 

 1872. Butl., Cist, Ent. i. 72: Leonata specified as type. 



357. Drusilla.* 

 1820-21. Swains., Zool. 111. i. i. 11 : Urania (Jairus), Horsfieldii. 

 Urania (.Jairus) specified as type. 



Used in same sense by Westwood : but the name falls before 

 Tffiuaris, and is preoccupied in Coleoptera (Leach, 1819). 



358. Dryas. 

 1806. Iliibn., Tent. 1 : PapMa. Sole species, and therefore type. 

 1847. Boisd., Voy. Deleg. ii. 588 : uses it for Leda, which has 

 notliing to do with the Hubnerian genus, but belongs to 

 a distinct family. 

 1865. Feld., Reise Novara, 305 : uses it for Cinaron, which has 

 nothing to do with either the HiAbnerian or the Boisdu- 

 valian genus ! See Aculhua. 

 Wallengren has followed Boisduval ; Bates has followed Felder ; and 

 Herrich-Scliaeffer, in his Prodromus, has fohowed both the one and the 

 other ! See Argynnis. 



359, D'Urbania. 

 1862. Trim., Trans. Ent. Soc. Loud. [3] i. 400: Amakosa, Sole 

 species, and therefore type. 



360. Dyctis. 

 1832. Boisd., Voy. Astrol. 138: Agendas. Sole species, and there- 

 fore type. 

 1851. Westw., Gen, Diurn, Lep. 353: the same. 



