174 PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY 



is evidently given to supplant Rhinopalpa (q-v.) preoccu- 

 pied, of which fulva was the type. 

 Fulva, therefore, and not Polynice, must be taken as the type of 

 Eurliinia. This name, however, is certainly very close to Eurhina 

 (Fitz., Rep. 1843) and Eurhinus (Kirb., Col. 1817). 



440. EURIPHENE. 



1847. Boisd., Voy. Deleg. ii. 592 : csBrulea. Sole species, and there- 



fore type. 

 Used in same sense (but spelled Eurj'phene) by Westwood, Felder, 

 and Kirby. 



441. EuRiPus. 



1848. Douhl., Gen. Diurn. Lep., pi. 41 : Halitherses. Sole species, 



and therefore type. 

 1850. "Westw., Gen. Diurn. Lep. 2^3: Halitherses, consimilis (Halli- 



rothrius). 

 1861, Feld., Neues Lep. 26 : uses it in the same sense. 



The name is rather near to Eurrhypis (Hiibn., Lep. 1816). 



442. EURYADES. 



1864. Feld., Spec. Ins. 39 : Duponchelii, Corethrus. 



Used with exactly the same limitation by Herrich-Schaeffor and 

 Kirby. Inasmuch as the Eelders remark that they had not seen the 



first species, Corethrus may be taken as the type. 



*■ 



443. EURYBIA. 



j 1816*. Ilubn., Verz. 17 : NicSBUS (Ni^osa), Halimede, Dardus (Upis). 

 (1818. 111., Wied. Zool. Mag. i. ii, 100 : Nicfeus, Halimede, Lamia. 



AVith the exception of the last species in each case, the usage of 

 Hiibner and lUiger is identical. Recalling the statements made in the 

 introduction to this essay, there can be no question that this name 

 should be credited to Illiger. 



1819. God., Encycl. meth. 459: uses it for Carolina, Nic£Eus, and 



Dardus. 

 1832. Guer., Iconogr., pi. 80, fig. 4 [Erybia] : Carolina. 



Whether Illiger or Hiibner have priority, Nicajus, by Godart's usage, 

 must become the tyi)e. 



444. EuRYCus. 



1836. Boisd., Sj^c. gen. 391: Cressida (Cressida, Harmonia). 

 Sole species, and therefore t3'pe. 

 In this sense it has been used by all subsequent authors. See 

 Cressida. 



