104 COLEOPTERA. 



the name under which it was received by M. Brisout, and 

 has been so long known here. 



I believe one reason why this insect has remained unde- 

 scribed by a British author, is that it was supposed to be the 

 male of C. urticce. The species is not common, but occurs 

 at Shirley (where I have taken several specimens in early 

 spring), Mickleham, and Deal. It may be shortly de- 

 scribed as asperifoliarum with dark tibiae. 



70. Ceuthorhynchus uliginosus, (Walton) Schon. ; 



Ent. Annual, 1863, p. 99, 95. 



Mr. Crotch remarks that Mr. AVaterhouse has disposed of 

 this species (as British) ; but that, as if to add to the confu- 

 sion, the Schonherrian type is not Coeliodes didymuSj as is 

 the late Mr. Walton's. 



71. Ceuthorhynchus campestris, (Ziegler) Gyll. in 



Schon. Syn. Ins. iv. part i. 523, 73. 



Mr. Crotch states that C. chrysanthemi is equivalent to 

 this species ; and that from it M. Brisout separates a smaller, 

 differently marked form as C. vicinns. I have taken a very 

 small form of this insect at Shoeburyness ; but cannot say 

 that I see any difference in the marking. 



72. Ceuthorhynchus rugulosus, Herbst, Col. vi. p. 



406, 386 J Gyll.; Schon. Syn. Ins. iv. par i. 

 527, 78. 



Mr. Crotch remarks that C. melanostigma is equivalent 

 to this species ; and that the proposed alteration wil remove 

 the confusion between that insect and C. melanostictusy 

 Marsh. 



