Sy ee Tt ee ese eee ee Pee eS = 
- 
en ee ane Eees le ee nee ee ee ee es ee ee Pad 
_ moved since I was there! Etc 
FLORA OF WASHINGTON. 
missed a permanent character. 
e compilation of data under the species is very valuable. 
The best part ot the work is the Grasses. 
The author has shown considerable independence in the re- 
left out though placed in the key. On page 147 under Agropyron 
biflorum we find Agropyron repeated in the line below when it 
should be Triticum. On page 157 the second Voluine of the Bot- 
any of California is made to appear in 1876 when it came out in 
1880. On page 160 Eleocharis obtusa should be ( Willd.) Schultes. 
On page 165 Carex festucacea var. brevior shouid be (Dew.) 
Fernald Proc. Am. Acad. 37 and not as given. 
Carex Douglasii var. laxiflora should be Mem. Torr. Club I 21 
instead of 2 20. On page 171 Carex nigricans should have been 
Mem, Pet. I 210 instead of 211. On page 183 Juncus alpinus var. 
insignis was published in 1868 instead of 1866. n page 184 
Juncus Mertensianus was pu 
page 187 Allium cernuum should be rch. 
I 2.. On page 165 Calochortus Lyallii’s range is given as Eastern 
Washington in the Cascades, if that is true the Cascade range has 
His treatment of the willows does not throw much light on 
