EHE d pep vate roto ga ASA UT E 
Nude OE LA 
hc fo^ je 3t - r 
308 
Herbario Isnardi specimen (err. typogr. speciem) vidi in quo pedun- 
culi extant et solitarii biflori et bini uniflori. » Reapse Linnaeus ipse 
declarabat se invitum a G. phaeo separare, Mant. 1, p. 97 (1767). 
Postea Lamarck, Dict. 2 (1186) p. 658, n. 26 Notam hanc edidit: 
< J'ai eru devoir réunir dans une seule espèce le Geranium phaeum et 
uscum de Linné. » Laudare potuisset Cavanilles quem caeterum citat; 
sed laudavit DC. Fr. 4, p. 846, n. 4543. Et Leysser: « Non negandum 
G. phaeum et fuscum potius varietates esse, quam verae species. » Fl. 
Ital. ed. alter. n. 683. 
Sero Smith (non Flor. Brit., nec Compend.) in Engl. Bot. G. fuscum 
L. Mant. ceu synonymon ad nostram retulit speciem, donec in Engl. Fl. 
V. 3, p. 233, n. 1 sub G. phaeo, illo G. fusco inter synonyma de- 
relicto, ita de eo effatus est: « G. fuscum of Linn. Mant. p. IT differs 
in having simple single-flowered stalks, in pairs, distinct frome the very 
ase. Otherwise I find no difference. We have it not in Britain. Linnaeus 
who cultivated it observed the leaves to be more rigid. » Hooker etiam 
G. fuscum praetermittere: Don, Hrt. Cantabr. Catal. ed. 13 (1845), 
p. 454, utramque stirpem separatim enumerare. Ita ut res non adhuc 
ceu omnino absoluta inter botanieos habenda sit. Verum est tamen, 
quod de G. fusco L. aut siluerunt generatim auctores, vel eum ceu 
synonymon, aut ceu varietatem G. montani considerarunt: cf. Lamk. 
Dict. 2, p. 658, n. 26, Kram. El. Veg. animal. Austr. p. 202, n. 8, 
Spreng. Syst. Veg. 3, p. 72, n. 21, Gmel. Bad. Als. 3, p. 112, DC. 
Pr. p. 641, n. 32, Poll. Fl. Ver. 2, p. 426. 
ixissem etiam Spach, Suit. à Buff. 3, p. 303, nisi ipsum semitam 
mutavisse novissem. Revera ego in Pyrenaeis unicam tantum formam 
percepi, nihil faciens quasdam de petalorum colore differentias, veluti 
eas quas, ex gr., observavi in Valle d Aure Pyr. septr. medior., de 
petalis atroviolaceis, sordide lilacinis et roseis. 
Geranium nodosum (Caesalpini) G. Bauh. Pin. p. 318, n. 12. 
Caes. Herbr. Tornab. 1563, fol. 958, n. 723, De Plnts. 1. 14, c. 96, p. 559. Koch p. 157, n. 3, Bert. 
7, p. 214, n. 6, Gaud. 4, n. 1565, DC. Dub. p- 102, n. 5. La Peyr. Herbr.; G. asl vutiouni- Geton fontaub., 
: i i R 
: p- 208, n. 289, t. 80, f. eiehnb. Icon. C. 15, t. 195 f. 4887. S bb. H t. Rom. T. 5, t. 9. Clus. 
Rar. pl. Hist. 2, 1. 5, p. 10, f. 1 et 2, J. Bauh. Hist. pl. 3, 1. 30, ^. 478, f. 4. Ovid. Montlb. Ind. 
otangr. Icon. p. 243, Moris. Hist. pl. Oxon. 9, S. 5, p. 516, t. 16, f. 92, Petiv. Hrbr. Br. t. 65, f. 4. 
J Flor. /Estate. Fruet. Jul. Sept. In Pyr. med. et orientalibus. 
Legi in Pyr. septr. aurigr. Donezan, supra Artigues, die 9 Aug. 
1843. Habeo a Deville e Cauterets. n Md 
