Tate—Onx the Floras of Norfolk and Lord Howe [slands. 2% 
bo 
= 
vi. Australian Species of Australasian Genera. 
Howe. Norfolk. 
Heaounaniay re aversOuisy Gm Oacemareriensseceestedeeteeseciaosciosee ie oon fat 
hagodia Dillardienty fib is cane eptessieeieessesee aececieeasas SOnEOdC ThA 2 
Melaleucarericifoliay Si7tinsses «ssc swssenicscrincen eases cee sees siete a sok eS 
Brachycome diversifolia, Fischer d&: Meyer..............0.0.. +0 if eo — 
iby onsiapreticnlavayene i ccasseencsneccscearaeceetseciedsce ae cstescrts te ee 
Westringia rosmariniformis, S7.........-...sseeeeeseeeseseeee eee te ke = 
Mion TREES M897 cgcucecacooceseenns.00 sbosencconconnssS00 Te ote eS 
DMianellarceruleay S7siec ssc cesses ee teen eeseeacee eee eee et 
Posrscriet :—My deductions will be found to confirm the views enunciated by 
Mr. C. Moore in a paper entitled ‘“‘ Remarks on the Botany of Lord Howe Island” 
in Vol. V. (for 1871) of the Transactions of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 
of the existence of which I was unaware until my attention was called to it by the 
Editor of the Macleay Memorial Volume when the MS. of my paper was in the 
printer’s hands. Like my informant, I have been unable to consult Mr. Moore’s 
paper as published by the Royal Society of New South Wales, the volume containing 
it having been long out of print: my knowledge of it accordingly has been 
derived from a few extracts obligingly furnished by my correspondent from the paper 
as it appears—with certain statistical omissions—in the Syduey Maz/, October 21st, 
1871.—R.T. 
