240 NATURAL SGIENGE. MArcH, 1893. 
different from those with which we started: by selection a new stock has been pro- 
duced, in some cases it is more virulent, in other cases less so. 
The dependency of the protective influence of inoculation upon the rate of 
multiplication of the pathogenic microbe will be seen when we leave ectasines and 
anectasines out of account and consider only phagocytosis. 
Whatever the nature of the stimulus may be, Cohnheim’s demonstration that 
diapedesis of leucocytes is the dominant phenomenon of the resultant inflammation, 
together with their action as phagocytes in presence of microbes, may be taken for 
granted. At the seat of inflammation, then, there is a terrific battle between two 
armies, the microbes attacking, the phagocytes defending. In both armies there is 
a great mortality, and the ultimate result of the battle depends upon the rate at 
which each army is reinforced—.e., upon the rate of multiplication of microbes on 
one hand and on the rate of migration of fresh phagocytes to the scene of action on 
the other. So long as the microbes have the best of it the feverincreases. Sosoon 
as the phagocytes become sufficiently numerous to cope with the microbes, destroying 
them more rapidly than they are produced, so soon does the fever begin to abate. 
The hypothesis in question is that the stimulus of the poison not only increases 
the diapedesis of leucocytes (7.e., transportation of the defending army of phagocytes 
to the scene of action), but also leads to an increased rate of production of leucocytes 
within the body, so increasing not only the size of the standing army provided for 
the defence of the body, but also increasing the rate at which new recruits are 
added to it. 
If the microbe army introduced be only an ‘‘attenuated virus,’”’ then that army 
will not have time to increase to unmanageable dimensions before the phagocytes 
appear on the scene; the disease will, therefore, be easily checked, and the net result 
will be an increase in the strength of the army of phagocytes, whose duty is the 
protection of the animal against the attacks of armies of microbes. 
I am not a pathologist, and only bring this to Mr. Bulman’s notice that he may 
subject it to that same criticism which has apparently destroyed the two theories 
with which he dealt in his article in the current number of NATURAL SCIENCE. 
C. HERBERT Hurst. 
Owens College, Manchester, 
February 13, 1893. 


TOC ORRESLONDIENT:S: 
All communications for the Epiror to be addressed to the EDITORIAL 
OFFICES, now vemoved to 5 JOHN STREET, BEDFORD Row, Lonpon, 
WEG. 
All communications for the PUBLISHERS to be addressed to MACMILLAN 
& Co., 29 Bedford Street, Strand, London, W.C. 
All ADVERTISEMENTS to be forwarded to the sole agents, JOHN 
Happon & Co., Bouverie House, Salisbury Square, Fleet Street, London, E.C. 
ERRATA. 
P. 86, line 39. For ‘‘pashs"’ read ‘ parks.” 
P. 87, line 20. For ‘‘ Ohazal”’ read ‘‘ Dhuyal.”’ 
