436 ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA 
[Carleton, 1814. Now in Kent, which see.] 
Glenelg, 1814. Included most of Nelson! and Hardwicke until 1851, and small 
portion of Rogersville until 1900. 
Chatham, 1814. Exactly as at present. 
Nelson, 1814. Very much smaller than at present, but enlarged to present 
limits in 1854, and including Derby until 1859, and Rogersville until 
1881? 
Ludlow, 1814 About as at present, but including Blissfield and Blackville 
until 1830, and most of Huskisson and Harcourt until 1854. Its northern 
line was moved somewhat to the north as at present in 1830. 
[Saumarez, 1814. Now included in Gloucester, which see.] 
[Beresford, 1814. Now included in Gloucester and Restigouche, which see.] 
Northesk, 1814. As at present, but including Southesk until 1879; a slight 
change in its southerly line in 1830. 
Blissfield, 1830. Set off from Ludlow, as at present. 
Blackville, 1830. Set off about as at present from Ludlow, but including most 
of Harcourt and Huskisson in Kent until 1845. 
Hardwicke, 1851. Set off as at present from Glenelg. 
Derby, 1859. Set off as at present from Nelson. 
Southesk, 1879. Set off as at present from Northesk. 
Rogersville, 1881. Set off nearly as at present from Nelson, with slight ad- 
dition from Glenelg in 1900. 
KINGS COUNTY, 1785. 
The four original parishes included all of the county. Their 
boundaries were re-arranged and considerably altered in 1795 with the 
admission of three new ones. The lines of the eastern parishes were 
complicated by the changes in the eastern county line. 
WESTFIELD, 1786. Nearly as at present, but with a change as at present in 
the south-east angle in 1795. 
SUSSEX, 1786. Included also the present Rothesay and Upham, the southern 
parts of Norton and Hampton, and portions of Hammond and Stud- 
holm. By the removal of the county line eastward in 1787, it was made 
to embrace also Hammond, Cardwell and Waterford; in 1795 it was 
made to include the present Studholm and Havelock, but to exclude 
Hammond, Rothesay, Upham and its parts of Hampton and Norton. 
SPRINGFIELD, 1786. Included parts of Studholm, and after the removal of 
the county line eastward in 1787, the present Havelock, but it was 
restricted to its present limits in 1795,and given exact present form in 
1899. 

? There is a great inconsistency in the Act of 1814, in the boundaries between 
Nelson and Glenelg, fully reflected in Baillie’s and other maps of the time. 
Glenelg’s western line is that of Carleton extended, which would bring it 
almost to the present western line of Nelson. On tthe other hand, Nelson’s 
eastern line is given as the western line of Chatham, and presumably that 
extended, which would bring it to its present position. Hence Glenelg would 
overlap Nelson through nearly the entire extent of the latter, and as it was 
formed first, it would reduce the latter to a narrow strip—as it is shown on 
the maps above mentioned. ; 
