60 SPOLIA ZEYLANICA. 
three elevations yielded their hundreds, where the Church 
Hill gave its thousands. The most important of these is the 
Bungalow Hill, a ridge of about half a mile in length, somewhat 
higher than Church Hill, which it overlooks at its western end, 
and embracing . everal rounded eminences and spurs. I found 
specimens both on and below the surface on all the crests and 
ridges, but in greatest number on a gently rounded elevation 
about a hundred vards scuth-east of the highest point. There 
is unluckily no earth cap at this spot, though the two highest 
crests are well covered. 
The third hill, which I have named Dhoby Hillock, is an 
almost imperceptible knoll, overlooked by Church Hill, on the 
Kttampitiya path. It is not above fifty yards long, but has 
yielded a very large quantity of pigmies, all from the surface, 
as it has no earth cap. 
The fourth and last, which I have named Ambalam Hill, 
lies on the eastern side of the path leading from the 
‘““ambalam,”’ or travellers’ shelter, on the Welimada road, and 
is parallel to the burial ground close to the western flank of 
Church Hill. It has no earth cap, but I recovered a number 
of pigmies from pockets of detritus along its eastern side. 
The specimens were not numerous, and werg all large and 
solid. 
Tam quite unable to suggest reasons for these four hills being 
selected as manufactories in preference to any others in the 
neighbourhood. None of them contain material in any shape. 
All have access to water, but are at least two miles from, and 
at a considerable height above, a fishable stream. The first 
two are large, commanding, and defensible ; the last two are 
insignificant in size and overlooked by higher elevations. The 
conditions of the four are so mutually contradictory, that I 
incline to believe that the occupants changed their ground 
according to seasonal or other vicissitudes. 
As regards the remains discovered by me, I have divided 
them into eighteen types, of which I annex a table later 
giving the numbers of each found by me in 1914. In the 
case of the much more numerous finds of 1913, I regret that 
I omitted to keep a census. Before discussing the types in 
detail, I desire to call attention to the very important difference 
