86 ROYAL SOCIETY OF CANADA 
two distinct stones. My interpretation, as will appear further on, 
requires that they should be on ome stone only, as I believe the 
second inscription is only a continuation of the first. It was there- 











C Ws MGM atone WAS 
DE *SVIGARAICHK 
D'IMNCEISIC CAPI 
AINEe DEeFRE GATE 
SAR OY | | 
o | CAC) ae: 
an Ve 
| 
COOENWIE POV R 
L-HONN EV Rog eon 
>. "PRIN CE oIALLOIS N= 
SVIVA NT o SAsCARRIERE 
AU AG Wee ee ENNE 
MIS + ENeLEVReMESMEe 




fore with some misgivings that I went to view the stones in December 
last. However, on careful examination I was soon reassured. It is 
