344 REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER OF FISH AND FISHERIES. 



1888 f — Duvar, J. H. (Secretary). Report of the Commissioners Appoiuted to Report 

 on the Lobster and Oyster Fisheries of Canada. Ottawa, 1888, 65 pp. 



1888 g— Fryer, Charles E. Report to the Board of Trade by Mr. C. E. Fryer, In- 

 spector of Fisheries, on the Injury Alleged to be Caused to the Fisheries 

 by the Deposit of Rubbish in the Estuary of the River Thames. London, 

 1888. 40, 11 pp. 



Cites tlie d;ima.i;o done to the oyster beds at the moutli of the Thames by the deposit of 

 rubbish and recouinumds certain regulations for preventing it. 



1888 h — Morgan, C. Lloyd. Oysters. <Murray's Magazine, London, January, 1888, 

 vol. HI, pp. 87-91. 



"All that I propose to do here is to say a few words, suitable for those who do not like 

 to bo altogether ignorant of such matters, but have neither the time nor the inclination to 

 be fully instructed, on the life-history of the oyster from its birth to its descent into the 

 eager and expectant tomb." See 1888 i. 

 18881 — Morgan, C. Lloyd. Oysters. <^Litteirs Living Age, Boston, January, 1888, 

 vol. 176, pp. 1(31-108. 

 A reprint of 1888 h. , 



1888 j — Oemler, A. Needs of the Georgia oyster industry. <]The News, Savannah, 



Ca., November 20, 1888. 

 1888k— Pike, R. G.; Hudson, W. M., and Bill, J. A. Eighth Report of the Shellfish 

 Commissioners of the State of Connecticut, for the year ending October 

 31, 1888. Middletown, 1888. 8°, 27 pp. 



Coi-tains an account of the procedures of the Commissioners and the general condition 

 of the oyster industry of the State in 1888. The area of ground hold by individuals for 

 planting purposes on October 31, 1888, was 78,167.50 acres. 



18881 — Segrave, E. S. Report on the Oyster Fisheries of Maryland. Foreign 

 Office, Misc. series, No. 8, Reports on subjects of general and commercial 

 importance. United States. London, 1888. 8°, 7 pp. 



A compilation of data previously jjublisbed relative to the extent of the oyster indus- 

 try of Maryland, with notes on the shipuient of the so-called "locked-oysters." 



1888 m — Winkley, Henry W. Molluscs found in the oyster beds of Cognac, N. B. 

 r.edeque and Snnnaerside, P. E. I. <^Bu]letiu of the Natural History So- 

 ciety of New Brunswick. No. vii, pp. 69-71. Saint John, N. B., Barnes 

 &Co., 1888. 



1888 n — Anonymous. Oyster-culture at Arcachon. <^ Blackwood's Magazine, Lon- 

 don, March, 1888, vol. 143, pp. 366-371. 



1888 o— Anonymous. Our oyster navy. <The Sun, Baltimore, November 20, 1888 

 A description of the Maryland oyster police force and its efficiency. 



1838 p — Anonymous. The oyster war. <^The Telegraph, Philadelphia, December 



12, 1888. 

 An account of the troubles in the Chesape.ake Bay in 1888. 



1888 q - Anonymous. Oyster Laws Enacted by the General Assembly of Mary- 

 land at the January sessions, 1884, 1886, and 1888. Annapolis, 1888. 8°, 

 30 pp. 



1888 r— Anonymous. Article lxxii. Oysters. Annapolis, 1888. 8°, 36 pp. 



A coiupilation of all the general oy.ster laws of Maryland operative in 1888. 



1889 a — Cow^en, John K. The Maryland oyster in State politics. <^TheSnn, Balti- 



more, February 4, 1889. 



A comprehensive discussion of the political reasons for the lack of encouragement to 

 oyster-culturists in the State of M.-iryland. 



1839 b — Delmonico, Charles. The Blue Point fraud. <^The Evening Star, Wash- 



ington, October 26, 1889. 

 A gastronomical discussion. 



