142 HELICEA. 



Pupa detrita Shuttleworth, Bern. Mitth. 



Pfeiffek, Malak. Bl. i. 158, (1863); i. 205, (1854,) pi. iii. figs. 9, 10. 

 Pupa viaritima Gould, 1. c. 



y Pfeiffee, Mod. iii. 539. 



In 1851, this species was only designated by name in 

 vol. i. ; the full description was given in vol, ii., the name 

 being changed by Gould to P. maritima. Shuttleworth's 

 description of detrita has not priority over the name I 

 have retained. In the third volume of the Monograph, 

 Pfeiffer considers it a variety of maritima, but later, hav- 

 ing received from me some specimens, he remarks on 

 them that they are similar to the Cuba detrita, but must 

 take the name of incana. He also says that the true 

 maritima has not as yet been found in Florida. 



Young specimens are furnished with several tooth-like 

 processes within the aperture, one being on the columellar, 

 one on the parietal wall, and a third on the base of the 

 aperture, removed somewhat within. 



The variety figured on pi. 79, fig. 17, is from Key Bis- 

 cayne, Fla. 



PUPA MODICA Gould, vol. ii. 319, pi. Iii. fig. 2. 



Pupa modica Pfeiffek, Mon. Hel. Viv. iii. 533. 



PUPA ARMIFERA Say vol. ii. p. 320, pi. Ixx. fig. 4. 



Piipa armifera Say, (Carycliium ?) Binney's ed. p. 21. 



Pfeiffek, 1. c. iii. 657. 



Chemnitz, ed. 2, p. 57, pi. vii. figs. 17-19. 

 Pujm rupicola Pfeiffek, Sj'mb. ii. 55, teste Pfr. 1. c. 



Say's original specimen is still preserved in the Phila- 

 delphia Academy. He appears to have considered it a 

 Carychium. 



PUPA BADIA Adams vol. ii. p. 323, pi. Ixx. fig. 3. 



Pupa hadia DeKay, N. Y. Moll. p. 49, pi. iv. fig. 45. 



Chemnitz, ed. 2. p. 117, pi. xv. figs. 25-29. 

 Pupia muscorum, pars, Pfeiffek, Man. Hel. Viv. ii. 312. 



Forbes and Hanley, Brit. Moll. iv. 97. 



