Nc'io Slides of Australian Cetoniidm. 241 



rate form of its clypeus (fig. 7) wliicli in D. rugosa (fig. 8) 

 is dilated at the apex. 



From D. hirticcjjs, Macl., (var. nirjrans, Mad.) it may be 

 at once distinguislied by its very different form and 

 sculpture. 



Diai^honia ohliqtiata, Westw. Plate VII., fig. 4. <?. 



? . Schizorhina ohliquata, Westw., Arcana Entom. I., 

 p. 103, pi. 28, fig. 1 (1842). 



cJ. Scliizorhina ocellata, Macl., Trans. Ent. Soc. N. S. 

 Wales, I., p. 16 (1863). 



This species must not be confounded with D. eucnemis, 

 notwithstanding that Burmeister misled doubtless by the 

 similarity of coloration, has, (Handb. III., p. 799), cited it 

 as the female of that species, a very distinct form, of which 

 both the sexes are now M^ell known. 



