PILSBRY: non-marine MOLLUSCA of PATAGONIA. 



549 



supposition that the genus had its origin in Antarctica, or one of the 

 Austral lands once connected therewith. 



Littoridiiia resembles the Ilolarctic Pa/iides/niia 2ind the genus Fliivio- 

 piipa ^ of Australia and the Melanesian Plateau, but until the external 

 genitalia of all can be compared, no well-founded opinion of the affinities 

 of these genera can be formed. 



Idiopyrgus is an Archhelenic genus, if my estimate of its affinities is 

 correct. 



The affinities oi LitJiococcus are uncertain. 



Pofaiiio/if/uts, in the form of the shell, closely resembles the genera 

 assembled by Tryon in the subfamily Lifhoglyphiiuv : Flinniuicola of 

 western North America, Lithoglyplius of eastern Europe, Pachydrobia, 

 Lacunopsis and yiiUienia of Indo-China. All of these genera differ from 

 PotamolitJius by the small number and large size of the cusps of the outer 

 marginal teeth." Fliinmiicola\\2iS male genitalia of widely different form. 

 The genus Petterdiana of Tasmania and Australia has a strong globular 



Fig. 6. 



Petterdiana tasmanica (Tenison-Woods), half row of teeth and an isolated outer marginal tooth. 



shell, with wide columella, similar to the primitive species of Potanwlithus. 

 The radula, hitherto undescribed, has the formula ^^,1 2, i, 5. 20. 25 

 (Fig. 6, teeth of a half row, and a detached outer marginal tooth). This 



' Fluviopupa n. gen., type F. pupoidea (Mousson) of Fiji. The teeth are of the usual shape in 

 Avinicolince, central with the cusp formula i^, admedian with lo subcqual cusps, marginals 

 with about 30, those of the outer marginal veiy minute. Shell pupiform, with obtuse summit 

 and convex sides, the aperture ovate, vertical or sloping forward below, the long parietal margin 

 straightened. Operculum thin, with nucleus near the base. Penis unknown. Hydrobia petterdi 

 E. A. Smith seems to be congeneric, judging from specimens sent from Manaro, N. S. Wales, 

 by Dr. J. C. Cox. These shells have the appearance of the European BythhtelUe, but differ 

 from them in dentition. 



'See J. Poirer, Journal de Conchyliologie, XXIX, 1881, pp. 1-19. 



