26 



General distribution: Adriatic and Mediterranean [Sicily (Heller), Palermo (Riggio), 

 West and South coast of Sardinia, 656 to 1553 m. (Giglioli, Senna), Adriatic, North coast 

 of Africa, South coast of Asia Minor, South and North of Creta, in depths of 620 to 2055 m. 

 (Adensamer)] ; Eastern Atlantic (Bouvier); between Iceland and the Hebrides, 725 fathoms 

 (Balss); off the south-west coast of Ireland, 20S to 72S fathoms (Selbie) ; off the Portuguese 

 coast (Norman); West-Indies, 118 to 1058 fathoms (A. Milne-Edwards); Andaman Sea, 18S 

 to 220 fathoms (Alcock); Arabian Sea, 224 to 284 and 719 fathoms (Alcock); Coast of Malabar, 

 237 fathoms (Kemp and Seymour Sewell). 



3. PoIycJicles baccafiis Sp. Bate. (PI. I, Fig. 4, 4^7). 



PolycJieles haccatus C. Sp. Bate, in: Annals Mag. Nat. History, 187S, Ser. 5, Vol. II, p. 278. 

 Polyclicles baccaia C. Sp. Bate, Report on the Challenger Macrura, 1888, p. 131, PI. XIV, Fig. i. 



Stat. 38. April i. 7°35'.4S., ii7°28'.6E. 730 — 915 m. Bottom; coral, i male and i female 



without eggs. 

 Stat. 297. January 27, 1900. I0°39'S., i23°4o'E. 520 m. Bottom soft, grey mud with brown 



upper layer, i very young specimen, 23 mm. long, without legs of the i^t pair, 



probably belonging to this species. 



The two specimens from .Stat. 38, which are of equal size, do not fully agree with Bate's 

 description and show especially some differences from his figure, but this figure i of Plate XIV 

 is certainly inaccurate. When being in London some time ago, I was enabled to e.xamine the 

 Challenger types: the dorsal ridge, which ,was described as being "without teeth or spines", 

 proved, however, to be sp inn lose and granular, but the small spines were here and 

 there worn off and less distinct than in the specimens from Stat. 38. 



As is proved by comparing the measurements, this species closely resembles in its outer 

 appearance Pol. typlilops Heller. The proportions between the length, the greatest width of 

 the carapace and the distance between its antero-lateral angles are indeed quite the same. The 

 carapace, not yet one and a half as long in the middle as measures its greatest width, appears 

 very slightly conve.x; transversely, e.xcept, like in other species, on the flattened hepatic regions. 

 Beneath the hairy tomentum, the upper surface of the carapace is beset with small, sharp 

 granules. The concave frontal border ends on each side into a strong and acute, flattened 

 tooth, at the inner angle of the orbital notches, and between these teeth that are directed 

 almost horizontally forward and the pair of ju.xtaposed rostral spines that are directed upward 

 and slightly forward, the frontal border appears somewhat spinulose in the male and slightly 

 granular in the female. The median, conical tooth that arises on the frontal wall of the carapace 

 immediately below the rostral spines and that is directed upward and slightly forward, is v e r y 

 large and reaches considerably beyond the rostral spines; in the male it is rather acute, in 

 the female obtusely pointed. The finely granular, median ridge on the gastric region carries 

 two small acute teeth standing side by side immediately behind the middle; between this pair 

 and the two rostral spines one observes in the male five, in the female four, .single, acute teeth 

 about of the same size, placed behind one another and between this pair and the cervical 

 groove the ridge widens a little and is here beset with irregularlv arranged, small, acute teeth 



