308 ANIMAL REPRODUCTIONS, 
ARTICLE III.——REFLECTIONS. 
From the numerous facts in the preceding ar- 
ticle, impartial readers will at once perceive that 
when I firft announced, in my Prodromo, the 
renovation of the head of the fnail, I only laid 
open to the philofophical world an inconteftible 
truth before unknown ; and that thofe authors, 
who have trufted to controvert my experiments 
by theirs, have been deceived. 
The reproduction which Roos obtained muft 
have been provided with a new brain, a portion 
of the cefophagus, lips, teeth, jaws, and tongue. 
One of M. Lavoifier’s {nails regenerated a new 
head exactly refembling the old. The brain 
mutt alfo have been reproduced, becaufe decapi- 
tation took place behind the four horns. 
No lefs decifive and judicious were the experi- 
ments of M. Turgot, ‘enon, and Heriffant. It 
is {pecifically faid, fome of the {nails were com- 
pletely deprived of the head. 
Muller’s experiments wonderfully correfpond 
with thofe of the Parifian academicians; and 
when I name Muller, I {peak of one of the firft 
German naturalifts. The fame diligence, faga- 
city, and circumfpection, which, befides the emi- 
nent knowledge that characterifes his celebrated. 
works, 
