58 CLASSIFICATION. 



cult to indicate by a description the difference which exists 

 between the shell of a pulmonate and that of a branchiate mol- 

 lusk, there are, nevertheless, few collectors who will not recog- 

 nize it at sight. Ancient authors, like Lister, MUller, Chemnitz 

 and Schroter, who have treated upon the terrestrial and fluviatile 

 mollusks specially, have rarely mistaken these shells ; and a 

 mistake of this nature is very rare among modern authors, 

 although a few instances might be cited. One can say only that 

 the shells of terrestrial pulmonates are inoperculate, with entire 

 apertures (holostomate), never nacreous, rarely spirally striated; 

 but one cannot give a single character expressible by words, not- 

 withstanding that all who have seen a certain number of species 

 can distinguish them with facility. The fluviatile mollusks, 

 nearly always unicolored, although they may resemble marine 

 groups as to form, can also be readily separated at a glance. 



Ferrussac and several modern authors have thought that all 

 mollusks inhabiting dry land respire liy the aid of a pulmonary- 

 sack, but nothing is less certain. Among branchiferous genera, 

 the Littorinas and many trophical Neritiuiv, live a long while 

 out of water. Tbe larva? of Auricula swim in the sea, and con- 

 sequently possess a branchial respiration during this period of 

 their life. AccQrding to Semper, Ampullaria has an accessory 

 pulmonary sack. If the inoperculate pulmonates are consid- 

 ered, with so much reason, as an incontestible group, it is be- 

 cause, apart from their pulmonary sack, they possess other 

 collateral characters of equal importance, as for example, the 

 position of the eyes, the organization of the mouth and of the 

 sexual organs. 



The rest of the gasteropods. after the exclusion of the pulmo- 

 nates, were divided by Cuvier into several very natural groups, 

 according to the form and position of the branchi;t (nudibranchs, 

 heteropods, tectibranchs, seutibranchs, cyclobranchs). The 

 magnificent work of Quoy and Gaima,rd is full of precious ma- 

 terial for the amelioration of the great group of pectinibranclii- 

 ates. The Trochidse are here shown to be inseparable by their 

 characters, as much external as internal, from Haliotis and other 

 seutibranchs, notwithstanding the presence of an operculum and 

 an elevated spire in the former. At the same time the great 

 sj'stematic value of the nacre was proved. Stomatella, with an 



