84 LITIIOSIID/E. 



Genus NEOCHERA. Hiibner: Verz. Schm., p. 173 (1816). 



375. Neochera eugenia. 



Phahena eugenia. Cramer : Pap. Exot., iv. 235, pi. 398, f. M (1782). 

 A^eochera eugenia. tUibner : Verz. Schm., p. 173 (i8i6j. 



Walker: ii. 449 (1854). 



. Butler: Trans. Ent. Soc, Lond., 1875, p. 328. 



— P. Z. S., Lond., 1877, p. 150. 



. P. Z. S., Lond., 1879, p. 162. 



Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent., 1888, p. 120. 



Aganais eugenia. Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent, 1879, p. 78. 

 a. Ternate (Wallace). b. Dorey (Wallace). c. Aru (2) 



(Wallace). d. Mysol (Wallace). e. Sumatra (Wallace). 



f. New Guinea (Wallace). 



376. Neochera marmorea. 



Hypsa {Euplocea) marmorea. Walker: vii. 1674 (1856). 



JVeochera 7uarmorea. Butler: Trans. Ent. Soc, Lond., 1S75, p. 329. 



111. Typ. Lep. Het., B. M , v. p. 43 (<J only), 



pi. 87, f. IO.J (1881). 



• Cotes and Swinh. (part) : Cat. Moths of India, ii. 87. 



515 (1887). 

 Snellen : Tijd. voor Ent., 1888, p. 121. 



Type. Sylhet, in B. M. 

 a. Sylhet. 



377. Neochera butleri. n. sp. 



Hypsa {Neochera) dominia. Walker: ii. 44S (1854). 



Neochera marmorea. Moore (nee. Walker) : P. Z. S., Lond., 1867, p. 677. 



_ P. Z. S., Lond., 1878, p. 847. 



Butler : (? only), 111. Typ. Lep. Het., B. M., v. p. 43, 



pi. 87. f. II ? (1881). 



Cotes and Swinh. (part) : Cat. Moths of India, ii. 87. 



615 (1887). 

 Swinhoe: Trans. Ent. Soc, Lond., 1890, p. 180. 



a. Assam {$ 9 types) (Jenkins). b. Sylhet (2). e. India (2). 



d. Cambodia Siam (2) (Mouhot). 



Walker's type of marmorea from Sylhet is perfectly distinct from 

 the common pale insect with white hind-wings, which has heretofore 

 been wrongly identified as N. marmorea. Walker's type is recorded 

 by him as being a female from Sylhet, but is a male, and is well 

 described and figured by Butler in 111. Typ., v. p. 43, pi. %T, f. 10. 

 There are both sexes in the B. M. collection, and there is a female in 

 this collection identical with the type also from Sylhet, and with a label 

 ' marmorea ' on it in Walker's own handwriting. Of the common and 

 perfectly distinct form which I have named after Mr. Butler there 

 are excellent series of both sexes in both the British and Oxford 

 Museums. Walker's description of marmorea, though incomplete, 

 is quite sufficient to identify the type by, * the head black with white 

 bands is in itself quite sufficient ; I have examined the type and the 



