66 Records of the Indian Museum. [Vor. XII, 
Mr. B. H. Buxton recently presented specimens of both sexes 
to the Indian Museum. The male, which was previously un- 
known, may be described as follows :—Length of carapace 8°7-10'0 
mm.; maximum breadth of same 5'0-5°8 mm. Closely allied to 
L. dawnae, from whichit differs only in the following particulars :— 
the distance between the median eyes is perhaps scarcely as 
great; the ridge in front of the lateral eyes is indistinct; the 
coarser granules on the carapace are somewhat more clearly defined 
and more regularly rounded; the arm and hand show more fre- 
quently a slight rugosity ; the spine on the lower surface of femur 
of the arm is sometimes obsolete; the tibia and hand are somewhat 
slenderer; the tibial apophysis (pl. ii, fig. 14) is slenderer and is not 
expanded distally—from above it seems no more strongly modified 
than that of Uroproctus assamensis, but it is triangular in section 
with the side nearest the hand strongly grooved. 
Labochirus dawnae (Gravely). 
(Piso. 7 ap loi, shies ora) 
Lower Burma: Ambherst District—*Dawna Hills, from Misty 
Hollow near top of western slope (ca. 
2200 ft.) to Thingannyinaung at base of 
eastern slope (ca. goo ft ). 
This species was described in 1912, and is not included in 
Kraepelin’s revision. The tibial apophysis of the male (pl. ii, 
fig. 15) is shorter than in the preceding species, but is of the same 
general form. In both these species this apophysis is very like 
that of the Ceylonese ( ? and Indian) species of the present genus, 
and like that of Hypoctonus oatesi, which appears to be the least 
highly specialized form yet known in the next genus. 
Labochirus browni (Gravely). 
(PlFa;, t122982) 
Upper Burma: MHsipaw (N. Shan) State—*Parni near Mong- 
long. 
Also described in 1912. Only the female is known. 
Labochirus andersoni (Oates). 
(Pl. ii, fig. 16.) 
Upper Burma: Bhamo District—*Second Defile of Irrawady. 
? Ruby Mines District—*Pudupyu Mountain. 
The latter record is that of a mutilated and immature speci- 
men that Oates described as the female of this species. 
The tibial apophysis of the male (pl. ii, fig. 16) is somewhat 
highly modified, as in the following species. 
