446 Records of the Indian Museum. [Vor. XI, 
S. longispina, but lacks the yellow tint of that of S. cavernicola. 
The immature specimens with it suggest that this is the normal 
colouration of the species. The granulation of the carapace is 
very coarse, and the tubercles are more numerous and more con- 
spicuous than in S. longispina. 
The ayms are longer than in S. longispina, the femora being 
about 20 mm. in length (four-thirds as long as the carapace is 
broad), but are very stout. The granulation of the femora, tibiae 
and hands resembles that found in S. longispina (compare figs. 10 
and 11, pl. xxxi). The only well-developed spines on the upper 
margin of the tibia are the three long ones near the distal end 
which are characteristic of the genus; all others are quite small, 
the contrast being more marked in the adult than in the immature 
specimens. The hand and finger resemble those of S. longispina. 
. The Jegs resemble those of other members of the genus, but 
the walking legs especially are of a much paler and more yellowish 
colour than in S. longispina, this colour difference between the two 
species being somewhat more marked in the legs than in the 
carapace. 
Stygophrynus cerberus, Simon.! 
(Plate xxxi, fig. 12.) 
The habits of this species from the Jalor caves (Gua Glap or 
‘““Dark Cave’’, and Biserat) have been described elsewhere.? 
Cotypes have been presented to the Indian Museum by the 
Cambridge Museum. 
This species closely resembles S. berkeleyi, but has all the 
integuments harder, much darker in colour, and more strongly 
granular (compare pl. xxxi, figs. Ir and 12). 
Stygophrynus spp. indet. 
In addition to the species from Saigon, Mentawei and Java 
already referred to (p. 444), mention may be made of ‘‘ an animal 
allied to Phipson’s Tarantula” found by Flower in the depths of 
the Batu Caves at Selangor,’ which may well have belonged to 
this genus, 
Genus CHARON, Karsch. 
This genus is represented in the Indian Museum collection 
by one immature specimen of C. grayi, the only species recog- 
nized by Kraepelin in ‘‘ Das Tierretch.”’ C. annulipes, Lauterer,* 
does not appear to be referred to in that work, but it cannot be 
recognized either from the description or from the figure. It is 
compared with C. australianus, Koch, a species now placed in the 
genus Charinius. Its position must remain uncertain till the type 
is re-examined. 
! Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1901, pp. 76-7. 
2 Fourn. Asiat. Soc. Bengal (n.s.), UX, 1914, p. 419. 
8 Rep. Austr. Ass. VI, 1895, pp. 413-4, pl. lii. 
4 F. Straits R. Asiat. Soc., No. 36, 1901, p. 40. 
