^i6 Records of the Indian Museum. [Vol. IV. 



there are two species of the same name by the same author from 

 North and South Formosa respectively, the former being synony- 

 mous with aconita, Don. (according to Donitz himself, who suggests 

 renaming it var. cohaesa), and the latter being apparently specifi- 

 cally distinct, as Theobald (Monog., v, 84) quotes it as ■' formosa- 

 ensis II," though he is unable to place it generically. 



A. formosus, Ludl., 1909. 

 Can. Ent., xli, 22, 9 . 



Theob., Monog., Culic, v, 8, 9 . 



Miss lyudlow notes (Mosq. Phil. Is., 10) the above species as 

 shortly to be described, the description appearing in due course as 

 quoted above. She says it is the only species in the PhiHppines 

 belonging to Anopheles (s, str.). Theobald has not seen it and 

 suggests it may not be Anopheles. 



From Benguet, Ph. Is., March 1908. 



A. gigas, Giles. 



Add. Ref. — Blanch., Moust., 184 {Myzuuiyia id.). 

 Add. Loc. — Ceylon [E. E. Green']; Deesa, W. Centr. India 

 {Maj. Nurse]. 



N.B. —This is made the type of James and Liston's new genus 



Patagiamyia. 



A. immacolatus, Theob. 

 Type in British Museum. 



A. lindsayi, Giles. 



Add. Ref.— Blanch., Moust., 169. 



Add. lyOC. — Dehra Dun (Mussoorie Hills, foot) [Thomson] ; 

 Ferozepore (Punjab) [Alaj. Nurse]. 

 Tvpe in British Museum. 



var. maculata, Theob., 1910. 



Rec. Ind. Mus., iv, i. 



•' A very distinct variety." Kurseong (5,000 ft.), 5-vii-o8; a 

 l^erfect 9 [Annandale]. Type in Indian Museum. 



A, simlcnsis, James and Liston, 1911. 



Monog. Anoph. Mosq. India, 2nd Ed., 41. 



This species, with f^if^as, Giles, and lindesavi, Giles, is placed 

 by the authors in their new genus Patagiamyia, but as this genus 

 is not admitted in this Catalogue, simlensis is referred to Anopheles. 



