1912.] E. Brunetti : Catalogue of Oriental Culicidac. 489 



PSEUDOGRAHAMIA, Theob., 1910. 

 Rec. Ind. Mus., iv, 26, near Grahamia^ Theob. 



P. aureoventer, Tlieol)., igio.' 

 Loc. cit., 27, 9 . 



Loc. — Pallode. Travancore State, S. India, i6-xi-o8, a single 2 

 [A iinandalc]. 



' ' A very marked and beautiful species which cannot be con- 

 fused with any other culicid." 



.Y.S.— Care must be taken to avoid confusion through the 

 similarity of these generic names, Grahamia, Pseudograhaima, Grab- 

 hamia and Pscudograhhamia. 



SQUAMOMYIA,' Theob., 1910. 

 Rec. Ind. Mus., iv, 28. 

 Theob., Monog. Culic, v., 529. 



S. inornata, Theob., 1910. 



Rec. Ind. Mus., iv, 28, & . 



Theob., Monog. Cube. \-. 529, <f - 



Described from a .«ingle c-- hi the Indian Museum from the 

 Dawna Hills (2 — 3 000 ft.), 2 or 3dii-o8 \Aniandalc. 



AEDES, Mg. 



Add. Ref. — Blanch., Mouse., 399, o' 2 . 

 Leices., Culic. Malaya, 183. 



'' This genus is closely related to Ciilex and Melanoconion on 

 the one hand, and less so to Aioretomyia amongst the Aedeomyinae. 

 In fact, nothing could better show how unscientific is a classifica- 

 tion based on palpi, than that genera so closely related as Culcx, 

 Melanoconion and Acdes should be placed in different families " 

 (Leicester). 



N.B. — Leicester, I hope, means " sub-families. " 



A. butleri, Theob. 



N.B. — In his Monog., iii, 295, Theobald created the genus 

 Vcrralina for Aedes butleri and two other species ; and Blanchard 

 (Moust., 417) retains the genus, but in the " Genera Insectorum " 

 Theobald does not mention it, referring 6w//m to the " uncertain 

 •position " section of the species of Aedes. 



Type in British Museum. 



I This species has inadvertently been dealt with bei<>re, see p. 460. The 

 mistake was discovered too late for correction in the text. — Ed. 



