PLAN OF THE ARGUMENT. 369 
and perhaps write, upon a subject so dear to us as 
zoological science, we wish to express our sentiments 
with all the moderation that can be consistent with 
a strenuous defence of opinions. We are sensible 
that all these may not be correct, but it is hard to 
believe that some are not fully borne out by the 
evidence produced. For those who may con- 
scientiously differ from us, we hope to preserve the 
same good-will as heretofore, and we only ask the 
same from them. One thing may be safely said, 
that, in discussing the state of science, and becoming 
a humble suitor in its behalf to those exalted few 
who have the power of honouring its professors, 
no feeling of a personal nature is to be answered. 
We can plead the cause of others, and rejoice in 
their honours, although physical incapacity and 
confirmed habits of seclusion will ever prevent 
individual participation. If but one firm and efficient 
step is taken, by those in power, towards reinstating 
the science of Britain in that pre-eminence she once 
held, we shall be amply repaid for the irksomeness 
of conveying censure, and of criticising public in- 
stitutions. 
(253.) In discussing the question now before us, 
we shall endeavour to point out the most effectual 
means by which zoological science may be promoted 
and upheld; first, by the universities, and secondly, 
by the government. 
(254.) If tastes are to be formed, and feelings 
implanted in the human mind, they will never so 
firmly take root as in the spring of life. Hence, if 
we may indulge a hope, that science may eventually 
hold that station among us which it elsewhere 
BB 
