[ganono] 



CARTOGRAPHY OF NEW BRUNSWICK 



3SS 



>)aia-a'/t's were on Prince Edward Ishind, and hence he left them on the 

 mainland and simply added the island, bringing them as we see on the 

 map, and this curious error is Ibllowed b}^ several others. It is quite 

 possible, as I have elsewhere argued, that this name C. des Sauvages 

 became fastened to the coast near Baye Verte, and suiwives altered in the 

 present Cape Torinontine/ but this is little more than a guess, and T have 



Fk;. 18.— SANSON, IfrâB. 

 From original ; full size. 



no proof of it to olfer. De Lact was not only a careful com|iiler and copy- 

 ist of maps, but he read Champlain's narratives with care, and in his 

 book he remarks on searching through Champlain's nari-ative for a 

 mention of the name St. Louis, which of course he did not tind.- De 

 Laet is closelj^ followed by Visscher. (Fig. 21.) 



The publication of the 1632 edition of Champlain caused it to super- 

 sede that of 1(112, and its influence appears in the Sanson map of 165(! 

 (Fig. 18), in which, however, a new word, Reglhouehou for the first time 

 Appeal's, taken, no doubt, from the Jesuit Relations, in which it occurs 

 in that of 1646 spelled Regibouctou. In other maps, however. Sanson 

 goes back to the earlier type, restoring ('. des Sauvages. 



It is Sanson chiefiy, though Avith some new information from the 

 missionaries, which Creuxius folloAVs in his map of 166(». (Fig. 19.) The 



' These Trans., VII., ii., IS. 



- UeLaet, though lie places St. Lunaire as a bay on his niaii. '" 'I's work speaks 

 -of it as a strait, which it really is. 



