[BOWMAN] DISCREPANCY IN TRUSTWORTHY RECORDS 143 
Harmonization.—That B sold his farm to C for £1,000, and that 
C subsequently resold it at an advance of £1,000 to D, who referred to 
it as B’s farm merely by association with B’s former ownership. 
The Circumstances.—The circumstances are the same as in Case 11. 
The first statement is a casual report of the farmer before the duke’s 
action. The second statement is that of the agent before the duke’s 
action, and the reference to himself as purchaser is merely in his capacity 
as the duke’s agent. The third statement is that of the duke after his 
action. 
CASE 13. 
The Discrepancy.—B states (1) to C that when leaving Toronto he 
met M; and (2) to D, that in going to Toronto he met M. 
Harmonization.—Impossible. 
The Circumstances.—B travelled from Guelph to Buffalo by way 
of Toronto, and his stay in Toronto was limited to a change of trains 
and a wait of a few minutes in the depot. During this interval he met 
M. On arriving at Buffalo B made the first statement to C, and on 
returning to Guelph the second statement to D. 
CASE 14. 
The Discrepancy.—B, C and D, who are all familiar with the sex 
division in church as described in Case 3, report concering the same 
service that they found exceptions from the usual arrangement as follows: 
B:. 2 men on the left side and no women on the right. 
C: 1 man on the left side and 1 woman on the right. 
D: 2 men on the left side and 1 woman on the right. 
Harmonization.—That B, C and D were in different parts of the 
church and counted respectively the exceptions visible in their vicinity. 
The Circumstances.—B was a woman on the right side and C was 
a man on the left, who, in reporting exceptions, did not count themselves. 
D was a man on his proper side. All were visible to one another. 
Case 15. 
The Discrepancy.—B states (1) that he has paid for the Smith 
place $1,500; and (2) a year later, that the place has cost him $2,500. 
Harmonization.—That in the interval B expended on the buildings 
$1,000. 
