452 ANNALS OF THE CARNEGIE MUSEUM. 
but I found it plentiful on Maug-o (written Mago by the missionaries) .”’ 
Garrett in his MS. catalogue of Partula gives ‘‘ Vanua Balavu (Garr.), 
Lantala (Garr. ), Taviuni (Garr.). In Proc. Zodl. Soc. Lond., 1387, 
p. 187, he gives these localities and adds that Dr. Graffe found it on 
Kanathia and Oneata; he says, it lives on foliage near the seashore. 
Presumably these specimens were obtained from Mr. Garrett. 
4237. ‘*Partula levigata Pfr., Coll. Geale.’’ On the back of the 
card is written “LL. 18, W. 8. Don’t think this’ 7eozears? The 
numbers are for length and width (not including aperture) in milli- 
meters. The measurements for this species given in Dr. Hartman’s 
MS. ‘Catalogue® (following Pfeiffer?) are ““L. 19, D. 9," sand 
“« Hab. ?’’ agrees with the label, which gives no locality. The word 
. +e) 
“« levigata 
on the face of the card appears to have been imperfectly 
erased. Mr. Geale accompanied Hugh Cuming in Polynesia. One 
specimen. It is quite closely allied to P. flexuosa Hartm. (No. 4238) 
but is shorter, and the aperture is not so broad and rounded ; color 
pale with a brownish tint and an obsolete peripheral band. 
The pencil notes on the back of this card and of No. 4238 appear 
to have been made at the same time, perhaps when Dr. Hartman left 
specimens for comparison with E. A. Smith of the British Museum, 
(see Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phila., 1885, pp. 205-206). - Presumably 
’? was partly erased at that time. No reference 
to this specimen has been found in the Hartmann correspondence, but 
in a letter from E. A. Smith, Oct. 2, 1884, he speaks of returning a 
number of shells. As the label is still perfectly legible, it may be pre- 
sumed that Dr. Hartman allowed it to stand, after being assured of the 
correctness of the identification. In Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phila., 
1885, p. 217, the species is marked with a +, indicating that there is 
an example in the Hartman collection. 
Notes.—‘‘ Partula micans Pfr., Proc. Zoél. Soc., 1852, p. 138.” 
This species is not represented in the Hartman collection. It is noted 
the name ‘‘ /evigata 
in his published catalogues, but in his MS. work it is not mentioned 
either as a valid species or a synonym. Mr. Garrett, writing May 22, 
1882, suggested that it might be the same as P. cemerea Albers. 
Partula cinerea Albers. This Solomon Island species is not repre- 
sented in the Hartman collection. At one time Dr. Hartman sup- 
posed it might be the shell which he subsequently described as P. flex- 
wosa (No. 4238). Mr. Garrett, writing May 22, 1882, suggested that 
it might be the same as P. mcans Pfr., the measurements being the 
