SMITH : CATALOGUE OF GENUS PARTULA. 455 
In the Hartman collection there are three photographs (mounted on 
one card), two of the figured specimens of P. corneo/a and one of the 
other example (No. 4343%). 
4243. ‘‘Partula minor Hartm., Erromango Isld., Dr. Turner, Coll. 
Cox.’’ A slip pasted on the back of the card has, in Dr. Cox’s hand- 
writing: ‘‘Collected by Turner at Erromango, Cox. P. cinerea 
Albers.’’ ‘Two specimens, types of Dr. Hartman’s description, Proc. 
Acad: Nat. Sc.) Phila:,, 1886, p. 37, Pl. i, Fig: 5 (the larger of the 
two). Probably Dr. Cox alludes to this shell in his memoranda 
written about 1881: ‘‘ P. cinerea Albers is said to be from the 
Solomon Isles and I send you specimens corresponding closely to the 
description of that species, but I feel vey doubtful about it.’’ 
The habitat given with the description is Erromango Island, 
Solomon Islands. As Layard pointed out, the island is not one of 
the Solomon Islands, but in the New Hebrides group; the mistake is 
corrected in Dr. Hartman’s MS. work. 
4244. ‘‘Partula concinna Pse., Tanna (Tauua, H. H. S.), New 
Hebrides.’’ On the back of the card is written, ‘‘ Purchased from 
the Taylor collection. Was labeled new species, N. Caledonia. ‘This 
is doubtless concinna Pse., New Hebrides.’’ One specimen, evidently 
the original of the figure published by Dr. Hartman, Proc. Acad. 
Nat: Se.-Phila.;. 1886, Pl. 11, Fig: 16. 
4245. ‘‘ Partula coxi Angas, Ysabel Isld., Solomon Islds., Brazier 
datum.’’ On the back of the card is written: ‘‘ Brazier datum. He 
says this is the species for which he proposed the name cox7, Angas 
MS. Garrett thinks it pe//uctda Pse. Brazier gave Pease this species 
from the same place.’’ See Dr. Hartman’s observations, Proc. Acad. 
Wat. Se. Phila, 1835,\p. 2a7, and 1886, p32. Seven specimens: 
These are the types of the species, first described by Dr. Hartman, 
Frocs) wicad. Si NateSe. Jehila 1886; p: 32, Pl. Ll, Pigs. 76) hs 
species and P. pellucida Pse. were collected by Brazier; he gave 
specimens to Dr. Cox, who appears to have confounded them. In 
memoranda written by Dr. Cox, about 1881 he says that P. coxi was 
named from specimens which he sent to Angas. ‘‘ It is from Solomon 
Islands, from several of them, but I cannot depend upon my informa- 
tion to decide exactly which’’ (see notes under No. 4246). Dr. 
Hartman says that his specimens were presented by Brazier and were 
from the original lot collected by him (Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phila., 
1885, p. 217). Mr. E. A. Smith, of the British Museum, agreed with 
30 
