SMITH: CATALOGUE OF GENUS PARTULA. 475 
graphs, No. 4337. Onthe back of the card is written: ‘‘ Photos 
from Coll. Cox, all returned.”’ 
4339. ‘‘Partula eburnea Hartm. (type).’’ Photograph mounted on 
a card, the original of the figure in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Phila., 1886, 
Diet Hie. xo. On the backsof the card is written:  ‘* Example 
returned to Dr. Cox.’’ ‘The species is not represented by specimens 
in the Hartman collection. 
4340. ‘*Partula eburnea Hartm. Hab.? Photograph mounted ona 
card ; it does not represent the same example as No. 4339. 
4341. Photographs of two specimens of Partu/a rufa Less., (No 
4298) and one specimen of Partula guamensis Pfr. (one of the ex- 
amples included under No. 4296), labeled ‘‘Partula rufa Less., Ova- 
lan’’ and ‘‘Partula guamensis Pfr., Ponape.’’ On the back of the 
card is written: ‘‘ Photos from my collection.”’ 
4342. ‘‘Partula rufa Less.’’ ‘‘Diplomorpha coxi Hartm. (type).’”’ 
Photographs of these shells, taken together. Both are from the Cox 
collection, and were returned to Dr. Cox. 
4343. Photograph, the same as No. 4342, but colored. 
4343. ‘‘Partula corneola Hartm., Eimeo, Moorea, Mr. Geale 
dat.’’ Three photographs, mounted on one card. Two are of the 
same shell, and are the originals of the figure in Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. 
Phila., 1886, Pl. Il, Fig. 6. The photographs are of specimens 
included under No. 4242. 
The photographic negatives are not catalogued, as they are un- 
labeled, and many cannot be identified. Some of them represent 
specimens from the Cox collection. 
DRAWINGS. 
4344. ‘*‘P. reeveana Pfr., E. A. Smith, Brit. Museum.’’ A water- 
color drawing, labeled by E. A. Smith, mounted on a card. On 
the back of the card is written: ‘‘P. reeveana Pfr.= dextral ofaher- 
tana. Drawn by E. A. Smith, conchologist, Brit. Mus.”’ 
4345. Water-color drawings of eight species of Partwla, ‘types 
from British Museum,’’ marked respectively: ‘‘ adéreviata Mouss,”’ 
‘* Zilacina Pfr., from type,’’ ‘‘ repanda Pfr. ; others are pale yellow,’’ 
‘‘filosa Pfr., ash striping more conspicuous,’’ ‘‘ mznuta Pfr., from 
type,’’ ‘‘ gonochelia Pfr.,’’ ‘‘mucida Pfr., from type,’’ ‘‘ decussatuta 
Pfr., differs from gonochez/a in spire being shorter, lip less reflexed, and 
extremities more converging—mouth larger.’’ On the back of the 
