152 
Orientale, in Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. ser. 4, Tom. iv. 402-409, publ. 
1904). Their classification is based, unfortunately as we think, 
Plantarum, i. p- ~), and is otherwise almost as obviously out of 
its affinity as “J. vaginatum.’’ Franchet’s [. sutchuenense is 
reduced to /. adiantifolium, Hook. fil. and T. Thoms. ; 1. trachys- 
pernum, Maxim., is omitted, and, while ‘‘ 7. anemonoides Kar. 
and Kir.’’ is retained as a good species, [. uniflorum, Hemsley 
and Aitchison, which is certainly the same thing, is treated as a 
variety of J. grandiflorum, which suggests that the authors must 
in this instance have had somewhat inadequate material before 
m 
: - Caespitosa to West Asia 
with the North-Western Himalaya: P. mic 
] 
laya; the remainder—of rather loeal occurrence in some cases— 
in J apan, Formosa, Southern Central and North-Western China, 
in Yunnan. 
