242 
leaves 1277 C of the Catalogue with the Rishikunda* label and 
allows one field label for each of the sheets enumerated in the 
is quoted in the catalogue under ‘‘ Sphaerosacme Rohituka, 
.; Andersonia Rohituka, Roxb.’’ This phaerosacme 
Kohituka, Wall., is really Amoora cucullata, and the quotation is 
correct as far as the detached large inflorescence of that sheet 
(left-hand bottom corner) is concerned. Otherwise it represents, 
as stated above, Sphaerosacme spectabilis, Wall. = Amoora spec- 
tabilis, Miq. 
I may add that the tree of Amoora spectabilis in the Botanic 
Garden at Calcutta, from which Wallich took svecimens in 1824; 
descriptions which Roxburgh drew up subsequently were pub- 
lished in Wallich’s edition of Roxburgh’s Flora Indica 
- 44, Bentham and. Hook 
united the genera Jeffersonia Bart je EA, ei «pee 
1 : sj , Maximn., 
from the Eastern United States and North-East Asia, respec- 
* Rendered Rohillkand in the - 
Stan ‘ s catalogue which is clearly an error. 
oak Sh id he Po in 1811, and Rishikunda is near Monghyr. 
ec 
age pso fatente abnormes 
